Telangana High Court
WP/1974/2009 of M/s. Tejaswi Jewellers (Pvt.) Limited, Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, on 31 December 2009
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1974 of 2009 Between: M/s. Tejaswi Jewellers (Pvt.) Limited, Amrutha Topaz
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 1974 of 2009
Between:
M/s. Tejaswi Jewellers (Pvt.) Limited, Amrutha Topaz Building, Panjagutta,Hyderabad rep. by its Managing Director, B.S. Neelakanta, S/o. Late B.Somesekharam, R/o.6-3-665/1, Panjagutta, Hyderabad.
..... Petitioner
AND
1. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by itsCommissioner, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.Commissioner, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.
2. The Additional Commissioner (Advertisement Section), HeadOffice, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.Office, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.
3. M/s. U.S.M. Business Systems Pvt. Limited, (AuthorizedAdvertisement Fee Collection Agent of GHMC), 1-8-319/2,Pattigadda Road, Behind Ford Show Room, Begumpet,Secunderabad-500 003.Advertisement Fee Collection Agent of GHMC), 1-8-319/2,Pattigadda Road, Behind Ford Show Room, Begumpet,Secunderabad-500 003.
.....Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the impugnednotice dated 08.01.2009 demanding to pay advertisement fee without disposing therepresentation of the petitioner dated 09.06.2007 as arbitrary and illegal, andconsequently set aside the same; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and theaffidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI C. PRAKASH REDDY,Advocate for the Petitioner and of Smt. Kalpana Ekbote S.C. for GHMC for therespondents, the Court made the following:
ORDER: There shall be interim stay of all further proceedings pursuant to theissuance of impugned notice dated 8-01-2009, to be in force, for a period ofthree (3) weeks.
Post 30-11-2009.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR// TRUE COPY //for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.
2. The Additional Commissioner (Advertisement Section), HeadOffice, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.Office, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.3. M/s. U.S.M. Business Systems Pvt. Limited, (AuthorizedAdvertisement Fee Collection Agent of GHMC), 1-8-319/2,Pattigadda Road, Behind Ford Show Room, Begumpet,Secunderabad-500 003.( 1 to 3 by RPAD)Advertisement Fee Collection Agent of GHMC), 1-8-319/2,Pattigadda Road, Behind Ford Show Room, Begumpet,Secunderabad-500 003.( 1 to 3 by RPAD)
4. One C.C.to Sri C. Prakash Reddy Advocate. (OPUC)5. One C.C.to Smt. Kalpana Ekbote Advocate. (OPUC)6. one spare copy.5. One C.C.to Smt. Kalpana Ekbote Advocate. (OPUC)6. one spare copy.
LNR.J
DATED 18-11-2009
POST ON 30-11-2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
W.P.NO.1974 OF 2009
INTERIM STAY
Bsr
Dt. 20-11-2009
HIGH COURT
LNR.J
DATED 18-11-2009
POST ON 30-11-2009
ORDER
W.P.NO.1974 OF 2009
INTERIM STAY