Telangana High Court
WP/28288/2007 of G.Srinivasa Murthy Vs The Tahsildar, on 31 December 2007
SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No :28288 of 2007 DATED:31-12-2007 BETWEEN: G.Srinivasa Murthy. ..... PETITIONER AND The Tahsildar, Ongole, Prakasam District & 3 others. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; learned Government Pleader for
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION No :28288 of 2007
BETWEEN:
DATED:31-12-2007
G.Srinivasa Murthy.
AND
..... PETITIONER
The Tahsildar,Ongole,Prakasam District & 3 others.
.....RESPONDENTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; learnedGovernment Pleader for Revenue; and the learned counselappearing for the respondents.
2. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus declaring theaction of the respondents in proposing to grant house site pattasto the weaker sections in the Ongole Koppolu donka inSy.No.350 of Koppolu village and Sy.No.12 of Ongole, which isthe only way to reach the land of the petitioner and othershaving about 400 acres of land, as illegal and arbitrary.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that he and others ownagricultural land in Sy.No.350 of Koppolu village, OngolePrakasam District and there is a donka land belonging to theGovernment leading to the agricultural land of the petitioner andothers and the said donka land is sought to be assigned infavour of the landless persons for the purpose of house sites. Itis stated that if the donka land is assigned the approach to thelands of the petitioner and others will be obstructed andaccordingly petitioner made a representation, dated 26-12-2007,before the 4[th] respondent-District Collector, Prakasam District,but no action has been taken so far. Hence, the present WritPetition.
4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, 4[th]respondent is directed to consider and dispose of therepresentation of the petitioner, dated 26-12-2007, if receivedand pending, giving suitable instructions to the Mandal RevenueOfficer, Ongole, Prakasam District while assigning the lands infavour of the landless poor.
5. Accordingly, Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as tocosts.
_________________
V.ESWARAIAH,J
31[st] December, 2007.Note:Furnish C.C. of the orderwithin two days. B/o Tsy