Telangana High Court
CRP/4761/2013 of RAJKUMAR BHARATLAL Vs ABDUL RAHEEM SHAREEF AND ANOTHER on 30 December 2022
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY , THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:4761 OF 2013 Petition under Section 22 of A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction control
I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE [STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE THIRTIETH [DAY OF ][DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND AND [TWENTY TWO]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI [JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY]
CIVIL REVISION[PETITION ][N][O:4761 ][OF 20][13]
Petition under Section 22 of [A.P. ][Buildings (Lease, ][Rent ][& ][Eviction control]...Rr!HGrc rf.,,t-{ t'.{ +tsAct, 1960f*lomnion OrOer dated [05/08/2013 ][in ][R.A. No- ][6712012 ][and ][R'A'No']7/20.13 [passed ]by the Hon'ble [Additional ][chief ][Judge, ][city ][small causes ][courts,]Hyderabad.
Between:
Rajkumar Bharatlal [S/o Late ][Raja Triambaklal, ][Aged 79 ][Years, ][Occ:- ][Retd]Service, Ft/o Plot No.71, [Whisper ][Valley, ][Raidueg ][Khalsa, ][R'R'Dist']- Hydeiabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Abdul Raheem Shareef [S/o ][Late ][Abdul ][Rehman Shareef, ][Aged ][45 ][years']Occ:- BusinessOcc:- Business
2. Abdul Lateef Shareef, [S/o ][Late ][Abdul Rehman Shareef, Aged 42 ][Years, ][Occ:-]BusinessBusiness (Both R/o H.No.19-3-306/1 [1 ], Jahanuma, [Hyderabad.)]
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: [SRl. RAKESH SANGHI]
Counsel for the Respondents: [NONE ][APPEARED]
The Court made the following: [ORDER]
THE HON.BLI} [SRI ][WSTICE ][A.VENKATESHWA.fu\ ][R.EDDY]CwIL RDVISION [PETTTION ][NO'4761 ][OFI?IIl3]
qBPEE
Heardletrnedcounselfortherevisionpetitioner.Pt:rusedthe [proceedin ]3s [dated ][08'02'2O ][17' ][wherein ][it is ][clearly]mentioned [tha ]I [sole ][revision petitioner ][died ][in ][the ][Y ][ear ][20 15]and no steps [\ ][/ere ][taken. ][Accordingly' there was ][a ][conditional]order to [the ][e ][fect ][that in ][default ][of ][taking ][steps ][cn or ][before]20.O2.2O17 [t,'ris ][Civil ][Revision ][Petition ][stands ][disrnissed]automaticallY.
2. There after, [this ][Civil ][Revision ][Petition ][was ][not ][listed]and till date [nc ][such ][steps ][are ][taken' ][Therbfore' ][hzLving ][regard]to the fact, [while ][giving ][effect ][to ][the ][proceec ][ings ][dated]Oa.O2.2C 17, [tt ][is Civil ][Revision ][Petition is dismissed for ][clefault']In the circumr [itances ][of the ][case, ][there shall ][be ][no order ][as ][to]thecosts.Mircellaneousapplications,ifanyperlding,shall stands closed Sd/. K. [VENKAIAH]AssrsrANr Sqt}ll:;ECTION OFFICER
//TRUE [COPY//]
To,
1. The [Additional ][)hief ][Judge' ][City Small Causes Courts ][al llyderabad]
2. One [CC ][to ][SRI ][RAKESH SANGHI' Advocate ][[OPUC]]
3. Two [CD ][CoPie ][']
VH w
/
I
I
HIGH COUR I-AVR, JDATED:3011212022
ORDERCRP.No.476' of 2013
Dismissed fbr C .R.P. for default5carolq-"ifr"
/,,(1'/a ,AE STAI€oA')'.}/a2 [q ][FEB ][ru23]zIIo]: