Telangana High Court
WP/4301/2020 of K. Bala Kistaiah Vs Telangana State Road Transport Corporation and 4 Others on 31 December 2020
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisd iction) THURSDAY , THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY K. Bala Kistaiah, S/o Late Ramaiah, Aged about 53 years, Occ. Ex-Conductor, E.800204, R/o.11-63, Redipally Village, Alladurga Mandal, Medak District-
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original J urisd iction)
THURSDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
wRlT PETITION NO:4301 OF 2020
Between:
K. Bala Kistaiah, S/o Late Ramaiah, Aged about 53 years, Occ. Ex-Conductor,E.800204, R/o.11-63, Redipally Village, Alladurga Mandal, Medak District-502269.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. Telangana State Road Telangana State Road Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by its lr/anaging Director,
1. Telangana State Road Telangana State Road Road . 8us Bhavan, RTC X Road, Hyderabad.
2, The Executive Director (O), TSRTC, O/o lVanaging Director, Bus Bhavan, RTC XRoad, Hyderabad.
3. The Regional Manager, TSRTC, Medak Region, Sangareddy.
4. The Divisional l\,4anager, TSRTC, Sangareddy Division, Sangareddy.
5. The Depot [\,4anager, TSRTC, Bus Depot, Narayankhed, Sangareddy District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia [praying ]that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofIvlandamus.
Page 1 of 2
LTo declare the action of the respondents in not reinstating thepetitioner into service as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of A(icle 14and 21 o'f Constitution of lndia.ii.To declare the order passed by respondent no.5 (dt. 2010412017),order [passed ]by respondent no.4 [(171071201 ]7), order [passed ]byRespondent No.3 (dt. 1610212018), order [passed ]by Respondent No.2(dt. 0111212018), as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 1 4 and21 of Constitution of lndia as they are [passed ]with zero application ofmind and with departmental bias and reinstate the [petitioner ]intoservice with all consequential benefits, attendant benefits includingback-wages from the date of suspension.tTo declare the action of respondents as Unfair Labour Practice iv. Anyother order or orders, this court may deem fit and [proper ]under thecircumstances of this case lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that in the circumstances [stated ][in ][the]affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court [may ][be ][pleased ][to ][direct ][the]Respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential [benefits,]attendant benefits and back-wages, by considering the [petitioners representation ][dt.]1910312019 and 2110612019 submitted before the [4th ]and 2nd [respondent ][pending]disposal of the above writ [petition ]in the [interest ][of ][justice ][and fair-play.]
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. V SIDDHARTHA GOUDCounsel for the Respondents: SRl. [N. ][VASUDEVA ][REDDY, SC ][FOR TSRTC]
The Court made the following:
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
$(/.P.No.4301 of 2020
ORDER
Lcarned counsel appearing lor the petitioner seekspermission to rvithdrau' the rvrit petition rvith libertv to thcpctitioner to prlrsue his remedies in accordztncc rvith lau,.
Rcscn'ing strch libertv, the Writ Pctition is dismissccl asu'ithdrarvn, No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if anv, pending shall standclosed.t SD/.K.ONESIMASSISTANT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY'SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. One CC to Sri. [V. Siddhartha Goud, ][Advocatg{q?qql-..^-]2. O;; Cc io sri [N. ][Vasudeva Reddy' ][SC for ][TSRTC ][[OPUC]]3, Two CD Copies.lPN/ry,/
I
HIGH COURTDATED:3111212020
ORDERWP.No.4301 of 2020
Dismissing the WPAs withdrawnWithout costs.
SN\ [c--,ogieA]1i\or)r F"
1HEeIa(co12 JA!{ 202ti*4=PAT.i
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…