Telangana High Court
WP/29593/2010 of K.Laxman Rao Vs The Joint Collector-II, Ranga Reddy Dist, on 31 December 2010
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.29593 of 2010 BETWEEN K. Laxman Rao. ... PETITIONER AND The Joint Collector - II,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.29593 of 2010
BETWEEN
K. Laxman Rao.
AND
... PETITIONER
The Joint Collector - II, Ranga Reddy District and another.
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. E. MADAN MOHAN RAOCounsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following order:ORDER:
Petitioner has filed applications dated 11.03.2008 and 25.10.2010 inthe requisite format under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition ofInams Act, 1955 and the Rules framed thereunder, for grant of occupancyrights. The last of the applications in the prescribed format wasacknowledged by the second respondent on 25.10.2010.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the said application is not being considered and disposed of in accordance with law.
3. Heard both sides.
4. In the circumstances, the second respondent is directed to examinethe applications of the petitioner, particularly, the one acknowledged by thesecond respondent on 25.10.2010 and if they are otherwise in order,consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law expeditiously.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order asto costs.
December 31, 2010DSK
_____________________
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J