Telangana High Court
WP/35777/2013 of Mariyala Yellam S/o Balaiah Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh on 30 December 2013
SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.35777 of 2013 Dated : 30.12.2013 Between: Mariyala Yellam, S/o Balaiah .. Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.35777 of 2013 ORDER : The case of the
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.35777 of 2013Dated : 30.12.2013
Between:
Mariyala Yellam, S/o Balaiah
.. Petitioner
And
The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others
.. Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.35777 of 2013
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The case of the petitioner is that respondents 5 and 6 are tryingto interfere with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the propertyand illegally trespassed into his property showing wrong boundaries.
Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed a complaint on 07.11.2013before the Sub-Inspector of Police, Toopran Police Station, MedakDistrict.
The grievance of the petitioner is that the 4[th] respondent is notregistering the crime and contrary to the same, the 4[th] respondent isthreatening him to withdraw the complaint. Hence, this writ petition.
Learned Government Pleader produced the copy of FIR dated24.12.2013 which shows that pursuant to the complaint of thepetitioner, crime No.353 of 2013 was registered.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view ofregistering the crime, his grievance stood attended.
In view of the fact that the complaint filed by the petitioner isregistered as crime No.353 of 2013, the Writ Petition is dismissed asno further orders are required. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in thiswrit petition shall stand closed.
___________________
P.NAVEEN RAO, JDecember 30[th], 2013.ssp