Telangana High Court
WP/28015/2007 of T.R. Anand Rao S/o Sruya Rao Vs The Jawaharlal nehru Technological University on 28 December 2007
SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.28015 of 2007 DATED: 28.12.2007 Between: T.R. Anand Rao and others .. Petitioners And The Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, rep. by its Registrar, Masab Tank, Hyderabad and another. .. Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU
WRIT PETITION No.28015 of 2007
DATED: 28.12.2007
Between:
T.R. Anand Rao and others
.. Petitioners
And
The Jawaharlal NehruTechnological University, rep. byits Registrar, Masab Tank,Hyderabad and another.
.. Respondents
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULUWRIT PETITION No.28015 of 2007
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaring theinaction of the respondents in disposing of the representation, dated06.04.2005, made by the petitioners, as arbitrary, illegal and violativeof principles of natural justice; and consequently to direct therespondents to consider the said representation made by thepetitioners.
The case of the petitioners, retired employees, is that, initiallythey worked in the hostel attached to the Engineering College of therespondent University and were later absorbed into the service of theUniversity with effect from 01.11.1990.While so, their grievance isthat, they made a representation to the 1strespondent on 06.04.2005requesting to take into account the past service rendered by them inthe hostel i.e. prior to 01.11.1990 for the purpose of calculatingpensionary benefits, but the same is not yet disposed of.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressingany opinion on merits, the 1strespondent is directed to consider therepresentation purported to have been made by the petitioners on06.04.2005, and pass appropriate orders, as per law, within a period ofeight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, andcommunicate the same to the petitioners.
With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of.No order as to costs.
28[th] December, 2007.IBL
_________________
JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU