Telangana High Court
WP/30410/2011 of M/S ROLLON CONTAINER, HYD Vs CENTRAL POWER DISBN CO. LTD., HYD on 29 December 2023
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 30410 0F 2011 [ 3300 ] ...PETITIONER Between: AND 1 M/s. Rollon Container, Rep. by
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 30410 0F 2011
Between:
M/s. Rollon Container, Rep. by its Partner Mr. Piyush Gadodia, S/o: late SriAshok Gadadia, Age 35 years, Office at Shed No. E, Sy.No.71lBlE, OldKurnool Road, Katedan, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
1Central Power Distribution Company Limited, of Andhra Pradesh (APCPDCL)Rep. by its Assistant Divisional Engineer, Shivarampally, Gaganpahad, Oppto Police Academy, Hyderabad.Rep. by its Assistant Divisional Engineer, Shivarampally, Gaganpahad, Oppto Police Academy, Hyderabad.
2. Gajanand Agarwal, S/o. Musadilal Agarwal, Hindu, Ro. Mahaboob Gunj,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
(R-2 is impleaded as per Court Order dt:22.11.11 in WPMP No.37879/2011)
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondent in trying todisconnect the Electricity supply for the premises of the Petitioner i.e. shed No. E,situated at Sy. No. TllBlElold Kurnool Road in Katedan lndustrial Area, R.R.District, as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondent herein noldisconnect the Electricity supply for the above said premises of the Petitioner, inthe interest of [justice.]
l.A. NO: 1OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 37678 0F 201.t)
Petition under section 1sl cpc praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cou( may be pleased to directthe respondent not to disconnect the electricity supply for the premises of thepetitioner i.e. shed No. E, situated at Sy.No. 71tBtE old Kurnool road in Katedanlndusftial Area RR District pending disposal of the Wp.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt pAWAN KUMAR AGARWAL
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRt R. VINOD REDDY, SC FOR TSCPDCL
Counsel for the Respondent No.2:--
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRIIUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKAWRIT PETITION No.30410 of 2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
2. Recording the above submission, this writ petition is dismissedas infrucfuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in theWrit Petition shall stand closed.
SD/. V.KAVITHAASSISTANT [R]RSECTION OFFIGER
//TRUE COPY//
To, '1. OneCCto Sri Pawan Kumar Agarwal, Advocate IOPUC]2. One CC to Sri [R. ][Vinod ][Reddy, ][Advocate ][OPUC]3. Two CD CoPiesTJGJ&"q HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212023
ORDER
WP.No.30410 ot 2011
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS.
rr\r[rq
1[t\][E STATE]vo2 3 [JrN ][2t2[]o-l*tDF=-s PPI[c,(]