Telangana High Court

WP/14387/1997 of Dr. M. Nagabhushanamma, Vs Government of A.P., on 31 December 2004

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.14387 of 1997 Between: Dr. M. Nagabhushanamma, W/o.Dr.M.N.Ramana Rao, Chairman, Nellore,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA

WRIT PETITION No.14387 of 1997

Between:

Dr. M. Nagabhushanamma, W/o.Dr.M.N.Ramana Rao, Chairman, Nellore, Zilla Praja Parishad, R/o. ZP Colony, 1st Lane, No. 25/1/645, Podalkur Road, Nellore.

..... PETITIONER

AND

1 Government of A.P., Rep. its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2 Government of A.P., Rep. its Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat, Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3 The Joint Secretary, Education Dept.,

Government of A.P., Secretariat,

Hyderabad.

4 The Joint Collector/Chief Executive Officer, Nellore.

.....RESPONDENTS

Page 1 of 2

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased topleased to pass an appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of therespondent No.2 in issuing Memo No. 18692/Ser.VI-A1/97-1 Edn. dated 02/07/1997as arbitrary, illegal, unjust actuated by legal malafides, contrary to articles 14, 21 and40 of the Constitution of India violative of Sections 193 and 248 of the A.P.Panchayat Raj Act violative of G.O.Ms.No.185 Edn., dated 24/05/1995 and alsoviolative of directions issued by this Honourable Court in WPMP.No.15746 and15747/97 in WP.No.13077/97 dated 25/06/1997.

Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.L.RAVICHANDER

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR EDUCATION

The Court made the following :

ORDER:

Sri.Srinivas, Advocate, representing Sri.L.Ravichandra learned counsel for thepetitioner states that the writ petition became infructuous.

The submission of the learned counsel is hereby recorded.The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.

______________

P.S.NARAYANA, JDated : 31[st] December, 2004.

Sh

To

1 The Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad.A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2 The Secretary, Education Department ,Government of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad.Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3 The Joint Secretary, Education Dept.,

Government of A.P., Secretariat,

Hyderabad.

4 The Joint Collector/Chief Executive Officer, Nellore.

5. 2CCs to the G.P. for Education, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT).

6. 2CD copies.

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead