Telangana High Court
WP/27489/2008 of Chitti Veera Raghava Reddy, Vs The Superintendent of Police, on 24 December 2008
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 27489 of 2008 Between: Chitti Veera Raghava Reddy, S/o. Late Bal Reddy, R/o. H.No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENTTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULUWRIT PETITION NO : 27489 of 2008
Between:
Chitti Veera Raghava Reddy, S/o. Late Bal Reddy, R/o. H.No. 2-7-970, Kanakadurga Colony, Waddepally Road,Hanamkonda, Warangal District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Superintendent of Police, Warangal District, Warangal.
2 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Subedari Police Station, Hanamkonda,Warangal District.Warangal District.
3 Chitti Deepthi, W/o. Ch. Srinivas Reddy, R/o. H.No. 2-7-970, Kanakadurga Colony, Waddepally Road, Hanamkonda, Warangal District.
4 Madadi Renuka, W/o. Madhusudhan Reddy, R/o. H.No. 2-7-970, Kanakadurga Colony, Waddepally Road, Hanamkonda, Warangal District.
5 Madadi Madhusudhan Reddy, S/o. Raghava Reddy, Andhra Bank, Bejjenki, Karimnagar District, R/o. H.No. 2-7-788,Jyothinagar,Jyothinagar, Behind Padmanayaka Kalyana Mandapam, Karimnagar District.
6 Madadi Deeraj Reddy, S/o. Madhusudhan Reddy, R/o. H.No. 2-7-788, Jyothinagar, Behind Padmanayaka Kalyana Mandapam, Karimnagar District.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleasedto issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus, declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in not takinginvestigation on FIR No. 436/2008, dt. 6-11-2008 pending on his file of SubedariPolice Station, Warangal District is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art. 21 ofthe constitution of India and also contrary to provisons of Sec. 157 and 158 ofCr.P.C. and consequently direct the respondents No. 1 and 2 to investigate thematter on FIR No. 436/2008, dt. 6-11-2008 of Subedari Police Station inpursuance of the representation dt. 3-12-2008 made by the petitioner.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU
W.P. No. 27489 of 2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaringthe action of the respondents in not taking up investigation in Cr.No.436 of2008 dated 6.11.2008 on the file of Subedari Police Station,Hanamkonda, Warangal District, as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to theprovisions of Sections 157 and 158 of the Code of Criminal Procedure;consequently, to direct the respondents to investigate into the matterpursuant to the representation dated 3.12.2008.
The grievance of the petitioner appears to be that he madea complaint and though it was registered as Cr.No.436 of 2008 on6.11.2008 on the file of Subedari Police Station, Hanamkonda, WarangalDistrict, the same is not taken up for investigation.
There is no necessity of going into all the details. It issuffice to direct the 2[nd] respondent to take appropriate action, inCr.No.436 of 2008, duly investigating the crime, as per law.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as tocosts.
C.V. RAMULU, J.
Date: 24-12-2008.
MVB.