Telangana High Court
WP/11883/2005 of P.Laxman Rao, Vs A.P.S.R.T.C., on 31 December 2014
SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.11883 and 7262 of 2005 COMMON ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. These writ petitions are filed challenging the proceedings, dated 02-03-2005 and 16-03-2005 issued by
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION Nos.11883 and 7262 of 2005
COMMON ORDER:
Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learnedGovernment Pleader for the respondents.
These writ petitions are filed challenging the proceedings, dated02-03-2005 and 16-03-2005 issued by the 2[nd] respondent.
In L.P.A.Nos.206 of 2002 and batch, dated 20-11-2012, the FullBench of this Court held that the Insurance Company alone is liable topay compensation.
In view of the same, the aforesaid proceedings issued by the 2[nd]respondent are set aside.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed. The miscellaneouspetitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order asto costs.
_____________________________
(A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J)
31.12.2014
Prv
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION Nos.11883 and 7262 of 2005
31-12-2014