Telangana High Court
WP/5134/2004 of M/s.Bhaskar Agencies LPG Distributor HP Gas rep., by Vs Union of India rep., by its Secretary to Government, on 28 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 5134 of 2004 Between: M/s.Bhaskar Agencies LPG Distributor HP Gas rep., by B.Lakshmikantha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
WRIT PETITION NO : 5134 of 2004
Between:
M/s.Bhaskar Agencies LPG Distributor HP Gas rep., by B.LakshmikanthaReddy, s/o B.Lakshmi Reddy, Occ:Business, r/o D.No.1-731-12J,T.T.D.Kalyana Mandapam Road,Yemmiganur, Kurnool District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 Union of India rep., by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Central Secretariat, New Delhi.
2 Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, rep., by its Territory Manager (LPG), LPG Bottling Plant, NH.7, 217/6 K.M.Stone, Post Box No.10-B, Camp:Post Office, Kurnool.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to issue an order or direction, more in the nature of writ ofmandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing theNotification published in Deccan Chronicle English Daily dated 30-1-2004,whereby and where under seeking to appoint LPG dealer in Yemmignur andKodumuru Villages and Mandals, Kurnool District, as being illegal, arbitraryand violative of Articles 14, 16 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India andconsequently stay the appointment in so far as the dealership relating toYemmiganur and Kodumuru Villages and Mandals, Kurnool District, whichare mentioned at Sl.Nos.62 and 63 of the said notification is concerned.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.PANDURANGA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents : SMT.A.P.LAKSHMI, S.C. FOR CENTRAL GOVT. FOR 1[ST] RESPONDENT. &
MR.O.MANOHER REDDY FOR RESPONDENT NO.2
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the cause inthe writ petition does not survive and therefore no further adjudicationis necessary.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
______________
G. ROHINI, J.
BJ/
To
1 Union of India rep., by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Central Secretariat, New Delhi. and Natural Gas, Central Secretariat, New Delhi.
2 Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, rep., by its Territory Manager (LPG), LPG Bottling Plant, NH.7, 217/6 K.M.Stone, Post Box No.10-B, Camp:Post Office, Kurnool.Camp:Post Office, Kurnool.
3. One c.c. to A.P. Lakshmi, S.C. for Central Govt. for R-1
4. One C.C. to O. Manohar Reddy, Advocate for R-2
5. Two CD copies.
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
W.P.No. 4206 of 2004
Note: c.c. in two days
28[th] December, 2004