Telangana High Court
WP/12207/2002 of Gali Ramanadham Naidu Vs The Joint Collector on 28 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12207 of 2002 Between: Gali Ramanadham Naidu S/o. Late G. Chengama Naidu Kobaka Village
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
WRIT PETITION NO : 12207 of 2002
Between:
Gali Ramanadham Naidu S/o. Late G. Chengama Naidu Kobaka Village Yerpedu Mandal, Chittoor District
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Joint Collector, Chittoor Chittoor District 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathi Chittoor District 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Yerpedu Chittoor District 4 Gali Poli Naidu S/o. Late Chengama Naidu Kobaka Village Yerpedu Mandal Chittoor District Chittoor District
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the natureof writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings No.D.D.S.E/2622/01, dated31-5-2002 issued by the second respondent as arbitrary, illegal and contraryto the directions granted by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 24142 of 2001,dated 23-11-2001 and consequently set aside the same and direct thesecond respondent to dispose of my appeal on merits, without insisting for thedisposal of suit OS.No.903 of 2001 filed by the fourth respondent with allother consequential benefits and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.JAGAPATHI, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent Nos1 to 3.: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for Respondent No.4: Mr. P.Vidyasagar.
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission towithdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. No costs.
_______________
G. ROHINI, J.
28[th] December, 2004
Note: Issue C.C. in two days.
B/o.
BJ/
To
1 The Joint Collector Chittoor Chittoor District Chittoor Chittoor District 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Tirupathi Chittoor District Tirupathi Chittoor District 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer Yerpedu Chittoor District 4 Gali Poli Naidu S/o. Late Chengama Naidu Kobaka Village Yerpedu Mandal Chittoor District.
5. Two C.Cs. to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court Bldgs. (OUT)
6. Two C.D. copies.
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
NOTE: C.C. in two days.
W.P. NO. 12207 OF 2002
28[TH] DECEMBER, 2004.