Telangana High Court
WP/20404/2004 of Smt. S. Shameem, Vs The Regional Manager, APSRTC, on 28 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 20404 of 2004 Between: Smt. S. Shameem, w/o Late Allabakash, R/o 2/175-2, 3rd Road, Near
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANUWRIT PETITION NO : 20404 of 2004
Between:
Smt. S. Shameem, w/o Late Allabakash,
R/o 2/175-2, 3rd Road, Near Income Tax Office, Anantapur, Anantapur District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Anantapur Region, Anantapur, Anantapur District.
2 The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Dharmavaram Depot, Dharmavaram, Anantapur District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Mandamusdeclaring the action of the 1st respondents in issuing proceedings dt. 4-2-2004rejecting the claim of the Petitioner for appointment to the post of Conductor Grade -II/Shramik in pursuance of Circular PD.No. 30/2000, dt. 5-5-2000 as wholly illegal,arbitrary and unjust, and consequently set aside the proceedings of the 1stRespondent dt. 4-2-2004 and direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner in thepost of conductor grade-II or Shramik in pursuance of the circular PD No. 3/2000 dt.5-5-2000 or any other suitable post on compassionate grounds.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.RAVI MOHAN
Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.P.VINAYAKA SWAMY
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a Mandamus todeclare the action of the respondents in issue proceedings, dated4.2.2004 rejecting the claim of the petitioner for appointment to thepost of Conductor Grade-II/Shramik in pursuance of CircularP.D.No.30/2000, dated 5.5.2000 as illegal and arbitrary.
Heard the learned counsel for both the parties.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that thepetitioner is fully qualified. As per the Circular orders, she has to beappointed as Shramik or Conductor Grade-II. since she has passedX class.
The case of the petitioner was not considered, but rejected bythe impugned proceedings, dated 4.2.2004 on the ground that shewas not possessing requisite qualification for any post. Now, thepetitioner filed T.C. (Transfer Certificate) showing that she appearedfor X class.
Therefore, without entering into the merits of the case, I deem itappropriate to direct the respondents to consider the case of thepetitioner in accordance with the scheme available and also subjectto the availability of vacancies, within a period of two months from thedate of receipt of a copy of this order.
The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the above direction.There shall be no order as to costs.
_______________
(K.C. BHANU, J.)
28[th] December, 2004.
bcj
To
1. The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Anantapur Region, Anantapur, Anantapur District.Anantapur District.
2. The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Dharmavaram Depot, Dharmavaram, Anantapur District.
3. Two C.D. copies