Telangana High Court
WP/28746/2009 of Eegala Pentamma Vs Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, on 31 December 2009
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.28746 OF 2009 Between: Smt. Eegala Pentamma, W/o. Appalanaidu ..... PETITIONER AND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.28746 OF 2009
Between:
Smt. Eegala Pentamma, W/o. Appalanaidu
..... PETITIONER
AND
Visakhapatnam Steel Plant,Represented by Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition)Ukkunagaram, Visakhapatnam District
....RESPONDENT
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.28746 OF 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The matter is coming up for admission.
2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisitiontakes notice on behalf of respondent.
3. This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus declaring actionof the respondent in not taking any action on the complaint of thepetitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified and violative of principles ofnatural justice and consequently to direct the respondent to take actionon the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law and passsuch other suitable orders.
4. The main grievance of the petitioner is that on the complaintmade by the petitioner the respondent is not initiating appropriateaction.
5. In view of the facts and circumstances, this Court is of theconsidered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of directingrespondent to consider and dispose of the complaint of the petitioner inaccordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be noorder as to costs.
___________________
P.S. NARAYANA, J
December 31, 2009MD