Telangana High Court
WP/27520/2009 of Smt. A. Naga Parvathi, Vs The District Collector, on 31 December 2009
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.27520 OF 2009 Between: Smt. A . Naga Parvathi, W/o. Krishnaiah ..... PETITIONER AND The
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.27520 OF 2009
Between:
Smt. A. Naga Parvathi, W/o. Krishnaiah
..... PETITIONER
AND
The District Collector, Guntur, Guntur District and others
....RESPONDENTS
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.27520 OF 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Court ordered notice before admission on 21.12.2009.
2. In view of the urgency pleaded by Sri P.V. Krishnaiah, the learnedcounsel representing writ petitioner, the counsel is permitted to take out urgent personal notice to respondent No.6. It is stated that respondentNo.6 is served.
3. This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus declaring theaction of the official respondents in not taking any action againstrespondent No.6 for establishing the mineral water plant under thejurisdiction of Vykuntapuram Gram Panchayat, without obtainingpermission from the Vykuntapuram Gram Panchayat, despite bringingto the notice of the official respondents as arbitrary, illegal,unconstitutional and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of Indiaand issue consequential directions, directing the official respondents totake appropriate action against respondent No.6 for establishing themineral water plant without obtaining permission from theVykuntapuram Gram Panchayat and pass such other suitable orders.
4. Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe writ petition.
5. In view of the facts and circumstances well explained in theaffidavit filed in support of the writ petition, this Court is of theconsidered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of giving liberty tothe petitioner to make appropriate representation to respondent No.2 inthis regard within a period of one week from today and let respondentNo.2 consider the same and pass appropriate orders in this regardwithin a period of two weeks thereafter. Till then status quo obtainingas on today to be maintained in all respects.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be noorder as to costs.
___________________
P.S. NARAYANA, J
December 31, 2009Note: Operative portion by wire atParty’s cost.B/O.MD