Telangana High Court

WP/41221/2014 of B.Mohan Reddy, Vs Peddapalli Nagar Panchayat, on 29 December 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TE{-ANGANA AT HYDERAAAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY , THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRITPETITION NO: 41221 OF 2014 Between: B.Mohan Reddy, S/o. Veera Reddy Aged about 61 years, Occ

[ [33021]

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TE{-ANGANA AT HYDERAAAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEIVIBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

WRITPETITION NO: 41221 OF 2014

Between:B.Mohan Reddy, S/o. Veera Reddy Aged about 61 years, Occ Retd.Employee, Ri./o. H.No.1-2-341318, Pragalhi Nagar, PeddapaHi, Karimnagar,District, Telangana.

...PETITIONER

AND'1 . Peddapalli Nagar Panchayat, Peddapalli, Karimnagar Districl. Rep. by itsCommissioner.'1 . Peddapalli Nagar Panchayat, Peddapalli, Karimnagar Districl. Rep. by itsCommissioner.

2. N.Lakshmi Varaprasad Rao, S/o. Venkata Narsimha Rao, Aged about 45years, FUo.H.No.1-2-34131C, Pragathi Nagar, near Missbn H(;h School Road,Peddapalli, Karimnagar District.years, FUo.H.No.1-2-34131C, Pragathi Nagar, near Missbn H(;h School Road,Peddapalli, Karimnagar District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutaon of lndia [praying ]that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may becircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction theaction of the 1st respondent in not taking any action for demolition of theunauthorized conslruction made by 2nd respondent in the [premises ]bearingH.No.'l-2-34l3/C, Pragathi Nagar, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District as illegal,arbitrary and consequently direct the 1st respondent to take action against theu nauthorized constructionsaction of the 1st respondent in not taking any action for demolition of theunauthorized conslruction made by 2nd respondent in the [premises ]bearingH.No.'l-2-34l3/C, Pragathi Nagar, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District as illegal,arbitrary and consequently direct the 1st respondent to take action against theu nauthorized constructions

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 51604 OF [20][ 141]

Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that [in ]the circumstances stated [in]the affidavit fited in support of the [petition, ][the ][High Court may ][be ][pleased ][to]direct the ['1st ]respondent to take action [for ][riemolitron ][of ][the constructions ][made]by the 2nd respondent in [premises ]beartng [H.No.1-2- 34/3/C, Pragathi ][Nagar']Peddapalli, Karimnagar District contrary to the approved [plan, ][pending ][disposal ][of]the WP

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. O. MANOHER [REDDY]Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI [N. ][PRAVEEN KUMAR](SC FOR MC,TELANGANA)Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI A. SURYANARAYANAThe Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATHW.P.No.4122L of 2QL4

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to approach theappropriate authorities.

2. Granting liberty as prayed for, the Writ petition isdismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

3. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending in thispetition, shall stald dismissed.

SD/-8. SARASWATHIASSISTANT REISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//SECTIONFFICER

To,i 'l . O;; One CC CC to iO SNI. SRl. O. MANOHER REDDY, Advocate [N. ][PRAVEEN KUMAR,(SC ][FOR ][MC,TELANGANA)][OP-UC] - - [.]loPUCla one cc io Snt. [A. ][suRYANARAYANA, ][Advocate ][[oPUC]]4. Two CD CoPiesBMGJP

,hb

HIGH COURT

DATED:2911212023

ORDER

WP.No.41221 of 2014

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION ASWITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

a.\[,+]

e [sTArC]1$(qvJo7 [IAN ][202[ ]i2oi-tlDEsptdt'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead