Telangana High Court
CRP/728/2015 of KAILA LAKSHMA REDDY Vs K RAMACHANDRAIAH AND 3 OTHERS on 31 December 2021
SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA CIVIT REVISION PETITION NO: 728 OF 2015 Petition under Article 227 of the constitution of India, against the order Dated 17-01-2007 Case No. Dt/331912009 in of the Joint collector (II) Ranga Reddy District at 177, Khairatabad, Hyderabad Between: KAILA LAKSHMA
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
CIVIT REVISION PETITION NO: 728 OF 2015
Petition under Article 227 of the constitution of India, against the order Dated17-01-2007 Case No. Dt/331912009 in of the Joint collector (II) Ranga ReddyDistrict at 177, Khairatabad, Hyderabad Between:
KAILA LAKSHMA REDDY, S/o._Late CjralQra Reddy, Aged 70 years, R/o. ChandippaVillage, Shankerpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy Districi
.....REVISrON PETITIONER/3RD RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
AND
1' K RAMACHANDRAIAH S/o. Late K pentaiah, Aged about 55 yrs occ Agricurture,R/o. Chanddipa Village, Shankerpally Mandal, ["Ranga ]Aeddy oGtiiii..... RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/RESPONDENTR/o. Chanddipa Village, Shankerpally Mandal, ["Ranga ]Aeddy oGtiiii..... RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
2. The Joint collector (II), Ranga Reddy District At 177, Khairatabad, Hyderabad
3. The sGDC & Revenue Divisionar officer, chevela Division, Ranga Reddy Dist.
4. The Thasildar, Shankerpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dist.The Thasildar, Shankerpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dist.
.....RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2
MF1
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit fired in support of the petition, the-High court may be preased to suspendthe order dt. L4/0712014 in case No. D1/33i9 0i zoog br il.,!inJ-r.rpo]r"oent,pending disposal of the CRp counsel for the [petitioner: ]sRI. RAMATIRTHA (not beingpresent)'ALLABANDI
Counsel forthe Respondents: None
The Court made the foltowing: ORDER
To,
THE H.)N'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P. SREE SUDH/I
CML REVISION PETITION No.728 of 2O15
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
On 10.|t .2021, when the matter was called, there wasno representar ion on both sides. Therefore, the matter wasdirected to be listed on 24 .12.202 I under the caption "fordismissal'. Or 24.12.202 1, also there was no representationon both sides and the matter as adjourned to 3L.L2.2027under the caFlion "for dismissal". Even today, when t-hematter is called, there is no representation on both [sides.]
Therefore this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed fornon-prosecutio r. No order as to costs. [Miscellaneous]petitions pendi .g, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/.T,'AYASREEASSISTANl' [REGISTRAR]SECTION [OFFICER]
//rRUE [coPY I ][I]
'3?&:
itlifl+ff ['*trh.*:ffi,li'tr-i'*i'J,,*'['#**rffi ]5. Two [[CD CoPies]]6. One [[SPare ][CoPY]][[CoPY]]
[[CD CoPies]][[SPare ][CoPY]][[CoPY]]vv
\
OATEDt3T/L2l2O2!
ORDERCRP.No.728 of 2015
.r'Y\E. [STATF],/i+lo15 [tEB ][2022]U\s"f-. :- --. [']
DISMISSING THE CI\ IL REVISION PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTIONWITHOUT COSTS