Telangana High Court

WP/26111/2006 of T. Rajendra, Vs Nizam Institute of Medical Sciences, on 26 December 2006

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SIX :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 26111 of 2006 Between: T. Rajendra, S/o.T.P. Maharadhi, R/o. 1356, Road No.45, Jubilee

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SIX

:PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINIWRIT PETITION NO : 26111 of 2006

Between:

T. Rajendra, S/o.T.P. Maharadhi,

R/o. 1356, Road No.45, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.

..... Petitioner

AND

Nizam Institute of Medical Sciences, rep. by its Executive Registrar,Punjagutta, Hyderabad.

.....Respondent

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring that the action ofthe respondent in issuing the impugned tender notification bearing Rc. No. Misc/2006/1/HRD/H1, dated 29.11.2006, published in Vartha Telugu Daily Newspaper,dated 02.12.2006, calling for tenders with regard to the contract of supply ofunskilled and semi-skilled labour to the respondent institute with effect from01.01.2007 to 31.12.2009 without enabling the petitioner to have adjudication of thedispute relating to renewal of the present contract resolved by Arbitrary Tribunal asper clause 18 of the Agreement, dated 18.09.2003, is arbitrary and illegal andconsequently direct the respondent institute not to introduce third parties into thesubject matter relating to supply of unskilled and semi-skilled labour to the institute (the contract covered by agreement between the petitioner and the respondentinstitute, dated 18.09.2003)

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and theaffidavit filed in support there of and the order of the High Court dated 18.12.2006made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Vedula Venkataramana,Advocate for the Petitioner, and of Sri S.S.Bhatt, Advocate for the respondent, thecourt made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

“ Counter filed.

Heard both sides.

Post on 26.12.2006 for judgment.

Till then, the interim order granted earlier shall continue. ’’

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

// TRUE COPY //

for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

To

1. The Executive Registrar, Nizam Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad. (by RPAD)

2. One C.C.to Sri Vedula Venkataramana, Advocate. (OPUC)

3. One spare copy.

RV

RV

Dated 21.12.2006

HIGH COURT

RG.J.

DATED 20-12-2006

POST ON 26-12-2006 FOR JUDGMENT

ORDER

W.P.NO. 26111 OF 2006

Extension

RV

Dated 21.12.2006

HIGH COURT

RG.J.

DATED 20-12-2006

POST ON 26-12-2006 FOR JUDGMENT

BSR

DT. 19-12-2006

ORDER

W.P.NO. 26111 OF 2006

Extension

HIGH COURT

RG.J.

DATED 18-12-2006

POST ON 20-12-2006 FOR ADMISSION

ORDER

W.P.NO. 26111 OF 2006

DIRECTION

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead