Telangana High Court

WP/11228/2019 of Kallem Janardhan Reddy Vs The State of Telangana on 30 December 2021

Cites 1, Cited by 0

THE ST 6o;.,.i 31E,35 f hljf,ili Ar HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVIBERTwo rHousAND AND rwrr.rrv orii,' PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETIT ION NO i 11228 oF201s Between: 'l . Kallem Janardhan Reddy. Sio, K. Srinivasa Reddvoeputy jiilei,

HIGH COURT FOR THE STST

THE STST6o;.,.i 31E,35 f hljf,ili [Ar ][HYDERABAD]

THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVIBERTwo rHousAND AND rwrr.rrv orii,'

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

WRIT PETITION NOi 11228 oF201s

Between:

'l . Kallem Janardhan Reddy. oeputy [[jiilei, ]]Sio, K. Srinivasa Reddvcherlopaili, K. Srinivasa ReddvSrinivasa ReddvHyoeraodo,lsfd Reddv. Kallem Janardhan Reddy. oeputy [[jiilei, ]]Sio, K. Srinivasa Reddvcherlopaili, K. Srinivasa ReddvSrinivasa ReddvHyoeraodo,lsfd Reddv . Kallem Janardhan Reddy. oeputy [[jiilei, ]]cEntiriFr.,ron, Sio, K. Srinivasa Reddvcherlopaili, K. Srinivasa ReddvSrinivasa ReddvHyoeraodo,lsfd Reddv[about ]31 years, Occ.Kallem Janardhan Reddy. oeputy [[jiilei, ]]cEntiriFr.,ron, Sio, K. Srinivasa Reddvcherlopaili, K. Srinivasa ReddvSrinivasa ReddvHyoeraodo,lsfd Reddv[about ]31 years, Occ.2. Nimma lvlahipal Reddy, Sio.Sanjeeva Reddv, AoedLiir"i,bi'JtriirprirJl:{bnrnrgar. Karimnas-ar D.irt|.i.1:ort 33 vears, Occ, DeputyLiir"i,bi'JtriirprirJl:{bnrnrgar. Karimnas-ar D.irt|.i.1:ort 33 vears, Occ, Deputy3. Ma,midi Tirumal Reddy, S/o. prathap Reddv, Aoed rJiir"i, bi'ri,i.t'ijriJ5l]{;.nrreddy, sansar6dd/Dirtii:irt [33 ]vea [rs, ][occ. ]DeputyJiir"i, bi'ri,i.t'ijriJ5l]{;.nrreddy, sansar6dd/Dirtii:irt [33 ]vea [rs, ][occ. ]Deputy- 8iH%i,t#Sji,fffi,;_I1sl|.,I:ddy, [Ased ][about ][33 ][years, ][occ ][Deputy ][Jairer,]8iH%i,t#Sji,fffi,;_I1sl|.,I:ddy, [Ased ][about ][33 ][years, ][occ ][Deputy ][Jairer,]

...PETITIONERS

AND

1.The State of Telanoana rep.. by. principal .Secretary to Government, Homerep.. by. principal .Secretary to Government, Home(Generat) Departmeni, sebrei;rijt, HvduiJnlo]i5."''',2The State of Telanoana rep, by..principal Secretary to Government, Homerep, by..principal Secretary to Government, Home(Prisons) Departmentl secret-jiiaij Hyae[[ii,1"s-.' ["''',]

3The State of Telanoana rep by Principal Sdcretary to Government, GeneralAd ministration Depatment, Seci6tariai.-iiyouiu"dJ,-i's.Ad ministration Depatment, Seci6tariai.-iiyouiu"dJ,-i's.4The Chairman, State Level police Recruitment Board, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad,TS,TS,5. The Director General of Police(HOF), State of Telangana, DG P Office,Lakdikapul, Hyderabad, TS.Lakdikapul, Hyderabad, TS.

6 plgte of Telangana, rep by Secretary to Government, Leqal Affairs, LeqislativeAffairs and Justice Department, Secretariat. Hyderabad, TS-.Affairs and Justice Department, Secretariat. Hyderabad, TS-.

.,,RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasedto issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamusto declare the action of the 1st respondent in Memo No. 307(P)/GeneraltA2l2O18,dated 1 ['1 ].10.201 8 rejecting the representation of the petitioners dated 21.12.2017circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasedto issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamusto declare the action of the 1st respondent in Memo No. 307(P)/GeneraltA2l2O18,dated 1 ['1 ].10.201 8 rejecting the representation of the petitioners dated 21.12.2017without assigning any reasons though the Secretary to Government, Legal Affairs,Legislative Affairs and Justice, Government of Telangana, has made favourablerecommendations vide Law U.O.No. 1140/TLSP/20'18 dated 22.09.2018, as non-application of mind, motivated, arbitrary, vindictive, illegal, and violation of Articles14, 16 and 21 ot the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the Memo No.application of mind, motivated, arbitrary, vindictive, illegal, and violation of Articles14, 16 and 21 ot the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the Memo No.307(P)/GenerallA2l2O18, dated 11.10.2018 and remit the matter back to the 1strespondent for passing orders on the representation of the petitioners dated27.12.2017 in the light of the recommendations of the Secretary to Government,Legal Affairs, Legislative Affairs and Justice.Legal Affairs, Legislative Affairs and Justice.

AooF 201

petition under section 151 cpc [praying ][that in the ][circumstances ][stated ][in]the affidavit [filed ][in ][support ][of ][the ][petition' ][the ][High Court may ][be ][pleased ][to]the [impugned ][order ][of the 1st ][respondent ][in ][Memo ][No']suspend 307(P)/Genera [ltA2l2O1s, ][dated ][11 ]['10 ][2018 ][and ][remit ][the ][matter ][back ][with ][a]directiontothelstrespondenttopassreasonedordersontherepresentationofthepetitioners daled [27 ][.12.2017 ][in ][the ][light ][of the ][legal opinion rendered ][by ][the ][6th]respondent [in ][Law ][U ][O' ][No ][114OiTLSP/2018' ][daled ][22'09 ]['2018 ][and ][other]pronouncementsoftheHon'bleSupremeCourtin(1990)3SCC655;(1994)lSCC1and 1995 [SuPP ][(4) SCC ][100']

Counsel for the [Petitioners: ][SRI ][S' ][RAHUL REDDY]

Counsel for the [iespondent ][Nos. ][1, 2 ][& ][5: GP FOR HOME]

CounselfortheRespondentNo.3:GPFORGENERALADMINISTRATION

Counsel for the Respona"nt [Ho'+t ][SRI ][M.V' ][RAMA RAO, ][S'C' ][FOR ][T'S'L'P'R'B']Counsel for the Respondent [No.6: ][GP ][FOR ][LAW ][AND ][LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS]

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE AtsI{INAND KUMAR SHAVILIwPETITIoNNo tt2280F2 019

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Counsel tbr the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw thewrit petition with liberty to the petitioners to fire a writ petition afresh.thewrit petition with liberty to the petitioners to fire a writ petition afresh.Permission is accorded and the writ petition is, accordingly,dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioners to fire a wrirpetition afresh. No order as to costs.petition afresh. No order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/-K,SAILESH IASSTSTANT&GtsTRARSECTION OFFICER

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. One CC to SRt S. RAHUL REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl

2. fwo CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of lelangana at Hyderabad.lourl

3. Two ccs to GP for Generar Administration, High court for the state ofTelangana. [OUT]Telangana. [OUT]

4. One CC to SRI [/.V. RAMA RAO, S.C. for T.S.L.p.R.B. (OPUC)

5. Two ccs to GP for Law and Legislative Affairs, High court for the state ofTelangana. [OUT]Telangana. [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies.

7. One Spare Copy.

zMP<P -.2-.2

<P -.2-.2

HIGH [COURT]

DATED:3011212021

ORDERWP.No.11228 of 2019

1[vtE]STAI {qct:,02 [tEB ][2022]).of,--lr*tl DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION,AS WITHDRAWNIWITHOUT COSTS, #--'i [al]z1 I,,-\U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead