Telangana High Court
WP/41048/2014 of Managing Director Vs The State of Telangana, on 31 December 2014
SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 41048 OF 2014 Dated 31st December, 2014 Between: M/s.Gangothri Nutrients & Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd Rep. by its Managing Director K.Madhuram Reddy. …Petitioner And The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary of
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO. 41048 OF 2014Dated 31[st] December, 2014
Between:
M/s.Gangothri Nutrients & Fertilizers Pvt. LtdRep. by its Managing DirectorK.Madhuram Reddy.
…Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana,Represented by its Principal Secretary of AgricultureSecretariat Buildings, Hyderabad,and others.
…Respondent
Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Govind Reddy for Mr.M.Venkatramana.
Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Agriculture (TS).
The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“It is prayed that the Hon’ble Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate writ ordirection, more in the nature of mandamusdeclaring action of the Respondent Nos.2 and3 from interfering and obstructing in day to dayaffairs of running the operation ofmanufacturing soil conditioner granules treatingit as fertilizer as illegal, arbitrary, withoutjurisdiction and violation of the fundamentalrights guaranteed under the constitution of Indiaconsequently directing to release the goodsseized and pass such other order or orders asthe Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper inthe circumstances of the case.”
At the hearing, it is admitted by the learned counsel for bothparties that identical writ petition being W.P.No.7135 of 2010 has beendisposed of by this Court vide order dated 30.03.2010.
In view of the above, this writ petition is also disposed of interms of the aforesaid order, with the direction that the reasons anddirections contained therein shall form part of this order.
As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.51403 of2014, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, shall stand disposed of asinfructuous.
_____________________
31.12.2014v v
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J