Telangana High Court
WP/40849/2014 of Smt. S. Gangamma, Vs The State of Andhra pradesh, on 31 December 2014
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.40849 of 2014 Date:31.12.2014 Between: S.Gangamma, W/o S.Bala Gangadhar ..... Petitioner And: The State of A.P., reptd by its Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Hyderabad and three others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms Hema latha
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDYWRIT PETITION No.40849 of 2014Date:31.12.2014
Between:
S.Gangamma,W/o S.Bala Gangadhar
..... Petitioner
And:
The State of A.P.,reptd by its Secretary,Civil Supplies Department,Hyderabad and three others.
.....Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms Hema latha Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declarethe action of respondent No.2 in initiating proceedingsunder Section 6-A of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955(for short ‘the Act’) against the petitioner.
Having regard to the allegations on which theproceedings under Section 6-A of the Act have beeninitiated against the petitioner, I decline to interdict thesame. However, the petitioner has pleaded that thoughher authorization has not been suspended and only ashow cause notice was issued by respondent No.3 on27.11.2014, respondent No.4 has stopped allotting theessential commodities to her for distribution.
At the hearing, learned Assistant GovernmentPleader for Civil Supplies (Andhra Pradesh), has stated that he has no instructions as to whether the petitioner’sfair price shop authorization has been suspended or not.In the light of the facts pleaded by the petitioner,respondent No.4 is directed to continue allotment of theessential commodities to the petitioner’s fair price shop fordistribution so long as her authorization remains in force. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition isdisposed of.
As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition,WPMP.No.51191 of 2014 filed by the petitioner for interimrelief is disposed of as infructuous.
___________________________
JUSTICE
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
31[st] December 2014DR