Telangana High Court
WP/45640/2022 of Banda Vaishnavi Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others on 29 December 2022
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:45640 OF 2022 [ 3183 I ...PETITIONER Between: AND Banda Vaishnavi, D/o, Mr. Satya
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO:45640 OF 2022
Between:
Banda Vaishnavi, D/o, Mr. Satya Narayana, Occ Student, R/o. H. No. 9- 2412,Boppapur, Village Yellareddypet Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District.
...PETITIONER
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Home Department,Telangana Secretariat at Hyderabad.Telangana Secretariat at Hyderabad.
2. The Superintend of Police, Rajanna Sircilla District State of Telangana.
3. The Station House Officer, Yellareddypet Police Station, Yellareddypet,Rajanna Sircilla DistrictRajanna Sircilla District
4. Lamba Balakishan Yadav, S/o. Lamba Devaiah, Occ Agriculture, R/o. H/No9- 26 Boppapuram, Yellareddypet Mandal Rajanna Sircilla District9- 26 Boppapuram, Yellareddypet Mandal Rajanna Sircilla District
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may becircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one inthe nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondent. lt isthe nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondent. lt ishereby submitted that if no action against respondent No.4 is initiated byrespondent No- 2 and No. 3 for his act of criminal defamation and criminalintimidation, it violates petitioners rights guaranteed under article 19 of theintimidation, it violates petitioners rights guaranteed under article 19 of theconstitution and hereby as petitioners left with no other option than to approachthis Hon'ble court to intervene into this issue and direct the respondent No. 2 andNo.3 to take strict action against respondent No.4 and hence his Writ Petition inthis Hon'ble Court;this Hon'ble court to intervene into this issue and direct the respondent No. 2 andNo.3 to take strict action against respondent No.4 and hence his Writ Petition inthis Hon'ble Court; lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased todirect the respondent No. 2 and 3 to pending disposal of the above writ petition inthis Hon'ble Court; Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. SUNKARA KALYAN DILEEP
Counsel forthe Respondents R1 TO R3: AGP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDYWRIT PETITION No.45640 OF 2022
ORDER:(ORAL)
This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Yellareddypet Police Station, Rajanna SircillaDistrict, in not initiating action on the complaint lodged by thepetitioner, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AssistantGovernment Pleader for Home, and [perused ]the material available onrecord.
3. Having received the written instructions daled 23.12.2022 issuedby the Sub-lnspector of Police, Yellareddypet Police Station, RajannaSiricilla District, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Homesubmitted that on the complaint lodged by the [petitioner, ]Firstlnformation Report No.371 ot 2021 was registered with YellareddypetPolice Station, Rajanna Siricilla District, for the offence under Section498-4 of lndian Penal Code, 1860, and [Section ]4 [of ][the ][Dowry]Prohibition Act, 1961, and after [completing ][investigation ][in the ][said]crime, charge sheet [was ][filed ][before ][the ][concerned ][[\4agistrate on]08.02.2022. A [copy ][of ][the said First ][lnformation Report ][and ][also ][a]copy of the charge [sheet have ][been ][served ][on ][the ][learned counsel ][for]the petitioner.
/
To,
4. Recording the aforesaid submissions, the writ petition is closed as
/
To,
4. Recording the aforesaid submissions, the writ petition is closed as no orders are required to be passed As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pendingin the writ petition stand closed. No order as to costs.
SD/-T.JAYASREEASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//SECTION
1. One CC to SRl. SUNKARA [KALYAN DILEEP ][Advocate ][oPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR [HOME, ][High Court for ][the ][State of Telangana,]Hyderabad. [OUT]Hyderabad. [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies
I
HIGH COURT
BVRJ
DATED: 29112120225TTts?).)$Tl11J[N)+flnsiORDERWP.No.45640 of 2022
WRIT PETITION IS CLOSED OF WITHOUT COST