Telangana High Court

CRLP/5136/2020 of Nimma Ravinder Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and Another on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5136 OF 2020 Between: Nimma Ravinder Reddy, S/o. late N. Venkat Reddy, Aged 54 years, occupation. Business, Rl/o. Flat No 201

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5136 OF 2020

Between:

Nimma Ravinder Reddy, S/o. late N. Venkat Reddy, Aged 54 years,occupation. Business, Rl/o. Flat No 201 , H. No. 17-1-383/106, NagariaResidency, Saidabad, Hyderabad.

......PETITIONEFYACCUSED NO [1]

AND

1. The State of Telangana, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court forthe state of Telangana, At Hyderabad.the state of Telangana, At Hyderabad.

2. Smt. K. Sulochana, W/o. K.Krishna Reddy, Aged about 50 years, Occ..Housewife, Rio. Villa No.41, Edent.Garden, Kokapet Village, GandipetMandal, Ranga Reddy District - 500 075.Housewife, Rio. Villa No.41, Edent.Garden, Kokapet Village, GandipetMandal, Ranga Reddy District - 500 075.

.....RESPONDENTS/COM PLAINANT

Petition under Section 482 AND 483 of Cr.P.C [praying ]that in thecircumstancbs stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, theHigh Court may be pleased to quash the Complaint and investigation in CrimeNo.593 of 2020, dated 2810712020 of Narsingi Police Station, Cyberabad andgrant

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2020

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C [praying ]that in the circumstancesstated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court maybe pleased to stay the investigation including arrest of the [petitioner pursuant ][to]the complaint and investigation in Crime No.593 of 2020, dated 2810712020 ofNarsingi Police Station, Cyberabad.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon [perusing ]the Memorandum ofGrounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri DIDAVIJAYA KUMAR ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutoron behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri M.BHOOPATI Advocate for theRespondent No.2

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NA(iII,RJ'UNCI IIMI:NAL PETITION No.5 136 of 2C :2O

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This Cr minal Petition is filed seeking quashment of CrimeNo.593 of 2('2O dated 28.07.2020 of Narsingi Police Station,Cyderabad, r:gistered against petitioner/Accused No. I for theoffence under Sect.ions 42O, 406,5O6 of the Indian l)enal Code and156(3) of the [( ])riminal Procedure Code.

02. No repr:sentation on behalf of the petitioner. Sri S.Ganesh,learned Assis ant Public Prosecutor for respondenl No. 1/State aswell as Sri M Bhoopathi, learned counsel for respondent No.2 arepresent.

03. Sri S.( ianesh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor forrespondent N l. i /State has submitted that the po]i,:e ,:oncernedhave complet,:d the investigation and charge shee,. rvas also hledand numbere C as C.C.No.2973 of 2O2l and to tlra[ extent liledcopy of procr:edings of the E-Courts pertaining ['.o ]thrs case ofPJCJ-cum-AI\ [M Courts, Rajendra Nagar.

04. In vie'r of the facts and circumstanc:s, since theinvestigation is completed and charge shect is fiied, the verypurpose of filing the Criminal Petition to quash Crirne No.593 of I

\

202O is defeated arrd thereby the Criminal Petition has becomeinfructuous and liable to be dismissed.

05. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed asinfructuous.

As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any,shall stand closed.ossi8lfiffi3fnan//TRUE [COPY//]sEcfrHN [oFFlcER]

To,i:1"""""i*#tti*+q,rltii.Hli##*-gH'"'tl*;:;::ff ' ai Hvderabad [oUTl

5. Two [CD ][CoPies]\P

HIGH COURTDR DNRJDArED:3011212022

ORDERCRLP.No.5136 of 2)20

,1r{[E. ][ST4IA]/l1o*(>16 [FEB 208]c:-l. i).,//.fE.'^'.,'rt< .'--,- DISSMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUSi

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead