Telangana High Court
WP/21687/2004 of Kandula Chittibabu, Vs Government of A.P., on 27 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 21687 of 2004 Between: 1 Kandula Chittibabu, S/o. Veera Swamy, Christian, R/o.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYWRIT PETITION NO : 21687 of 2004
Between:
1 Kandula Chittibabu, S/o. Veera Swamy, Christian, R/o. H.No. 13-145/5, Christian Colony, Shadnagar, R/o. H.No. 13-145/5, Christian Colony, Shadnagar, Mahaboobnagar District.
2 Shaik Ghouse, S/o. Shaik Ibrahim,
R/o. H.No. 13-44, Nehru Colony, Shadnagar, Mahaboobnagar District.
AND
... PETITIONERS
1 Government of A.P., Rep by its Secretary, Home, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2 Deputy Inspector General of Police, Hyderabad Range, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.
3 District Superintendent of Police, Mahaboobnagar District.
4 Station Housing Officer, Shadnagar Police Station, Mahaboobnagar District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue any writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of MANDAMUSdeclaring the inaction on the part of the Respondents in protecting the interests ofthe depositors of SR Traders by allowing lifting of the goods by Sub-Inspector ofPolice as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct necessary and proper steps tosafe guard my interests and also other depositors of SR Traders.
Counsel for the Petitioners: DR.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR
The Court at the admission stage made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
The petitioners seek a declaration that the inaction on the part of the respondents inprotecting the interests of the depositors of S.R.Traders, is illegal and arbitrary, andseek a consequential direction to the respondents to take action against the saidagency.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader forHome.
The petitioners have narrated several facts in relation to the nature and extent ofbusiness said to have been undertaken by M/s.S.R.Traders at Shadnagar. Thepetitioners have placed before this Court certain newspaper reports, as well ascomplaints said to have been submitted by various individuals. They have notreferred to the complaints, if any, submitted by them. Further, the agency, againstwhich the petitioners prayed for action, is not made a party.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioners to makesuitable complaints before the concerned agency, if they have got any specificgrievance. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________
27[th] December, 2004
pan
1 The Secretary, Department of Home,
Government of Andhra Pradesh,
Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2 Deputy Inspector General of Police, Hyderabad Range, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.
3 District Superintendent of Police, Mahaboobnagar District.
4 Station House Officer, Shadnagar Police Station, Mahaboobnagar District.
5 Two C.Cs to the Govt.Pleader for Home, High Court building, Hyderabad (OUT).
6 Two C.D.copies.