Telangana High Court
WP/326/1998 of Yalamanchili Vijaya, Vs The Mandal Revenue Officer, on 30 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 326 of 1998 Between: Yalamanchili Vijaya, minor rep. by guardian Mother Smt.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
WRIT PETITION NO : 326 of 1998
Between:
Yalamanchili Vijaya, minor rep. by guardian Mother Smt. Chinnamma Devi, W/oRamesh Babu, aged about 35 years, R/o. Jayanthi Buildings, Ashok Nagar, Eluru,West Godavari District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Nandivada Mandal, Krishna District.
2 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Nandivada P.S., Krishna District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue a Writ, order or direction more appropriately a Writ of Mandamus declaring theaction of the respondents herein in proclaiming that there is an order U/Section 145of Cr.P.C. with regard to a strip of land in an extent of about Ac.1.00 of land inR.S.No.205 of Kudaravalli Village, Nandivada Mandal, Krishna District as claimedby them now and consequently threatening the petitioner and her family members toremove the oil engine and pump set there in as illegal, Arbitrary, biased,Unconstitutional, and against the principles of natural justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.S.N.V.PRASAD BABU
Counsel for the Respondents GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of thisCourt to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded.The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
___________________
30[th] December, 2004
To
1. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Nandivada mandal, Krishna District,
2. The Sub-Inspector ofPolice, Nandivada P.S. Krishna District,
3. 2 C.Cs to Govt. Pleader for Revenue, High Court buildings, Hyderabad(O.U.T.)(O.U.T.)
4. 2 C.D. copies.