Telangana High Court
WP/26923/2007 of S. Mehamood, (Cuddapah) Kadapa. Vs The Station House Officer, Kadapa, Kadapa District. on 31 December 2007
A . GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.26923 OF 2007 DATE: 31.12.2007 Between: S. Mehamood ..... PETITIONER AND The Station House Officer, Kadapa, Kadapa District & another. .....RESPONDENTS HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A . GOPAL REDDY AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDYANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26923 OF 2007
DATE: 31.12.2007
Between:
S. Mehamood
AND
..... PETITIONER
The Station House Officer,Kadapa, Kadapa District& another.
.....RESPONDENTS
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDYAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 26923 OF 2007
ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao)
This is a taken up writ petition pursuant to a telegram sent on13.12.2007. Notice was issued to the respondents and the Inspectorof Police, Central Crime Station, Kadapa filed his detailed counteraffidavit pointing out that the petitioner is accused No.2 in CrimeNo.167 of 2007 for the offences under Sections 420, 465, 468, 506 r/w34 IPC and in fact, he was working as a Class-IV employee with theSub-Registrar Office and it is alleged that he has created a falsedocument and that he has not been apprehended by the police at alland that he is freely moving about in the society and that he has applied for leave for a period of ten days between 01.12.2007 to10.12.2007, which was sanctioned by his officer. Therefore, thecontents of the telegram sent to this Court, which is treated as a suomoto writ petition are inaccurate and incorrect.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
________________
A. GOPAL REDDY, J.
31.12.2007tsr
_______________________
NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO,J.