Telangana High Court
WP/40638/2014 of J. Nirmalamma, S/o. J.Eswariah, Vs The state of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary on 30 December 2014
SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.40638 of 2014 Dated: 30.12.2014 Between: J.Nirmalamma. .. Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. .. Respondents Counsel for the
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.40638 of 2014Dated: 30.12.2014
Between:J.Nirmalamma. .. Petitioner andThe State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by itsPrincipal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department,Secretariat, Hyderabadand others. .. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. K.Narsi ReddyCounsel for the respondents : AGP for Civil Supplies (AP)
The court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to set asideproceedings No.RC.D1CS/5612/2014, dated 25.08.2014, ofrespondent No.4, whereby he has suspended the petitioner’s fair priceshop authorisation, while issuing show cause notice.
At the hearing, respondent No.4 is personally present and hehas placed before the Court, through the learned Government Pleaderfor Civil Supplies (AP), letter in Rc.No.D1CS/5612/2014, dated29.12.2014, addressed to the Government Pleader, whereby he hasinformed that vide proceedings in D.Dis.No.D1CS/5612/2014, dated27.12.2014, the petitioner’s fair price shop authorisation was restoredand the Tahsildar, Ananthapuramu was directed to allot the essentialcommodities to the petitioner’s fair price shop.
In view of the corrective steps taken by respondent No.4, thegrievance of the petitioner stood redressed and the Writ Petition is,accordingly, disposed of as infructuous.
As a sequel, W.P.M.P.No.50939 of 2014, filed by the petitionerfor interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous.
_____________________
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J