Telangana High Court
WP/29321/2011 of Mohammed FArooq Vs The Office of Collector, Ranga Reddy District, on 31 December 2024
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRry FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 29321 OF 2011 [ 3302 I ...PETITIONER Between: Mohammed FApoq, S/o. Late Mohammed Ali aged
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRry FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 29321 OF 2011
Between:
Mohammed FApoq, S/o. Late Mohammed Ali aged about 42 years, Occ:Business Rl/o. H.No. 19-2-111341120, Bilal Nagai, Kalapather, Hyderabad,A.P.A.P.
...PETITIONER
AND
1The Office of Collector, Ranga Reddy District, rep. by its Collector,R.R.District, Office at Lakdi Ka Pul, Hyderabad.R.R.District, Office at Lakdi Ka Pul, Hyderabad.
2The V.R.O. Office, Saroornagar Mandal, rep. by its VRO Officer, Office atSaroornagar, R.R.District.Saroornagar, R.R.District.
3The M.R.O. Office, Saroornagar Mandal, rep. by its VRO Officer, Office atSaroornagar, R.R.District.Saroornagar, R.R.District.
4The R.l. Office, Saroomagar [\/andal, rep. by its VRO Officer, Office atSaroornagar, R. R.District.Saroornagar, R. R.District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature ofpleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature ofmandamus declaring the inaction of the ['1st ]respondent in not regularizing theSchedule House property of petitioner bearing Municipal No. 6-67, (Correspondingto old H.No. 5-36/2) totally admeasuring 1495 sq. yds., situated at Omer Colony,Pahadi Shareef Road, Mamidipally Village, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R.District,to old H.No. 5-36/2) totally admeasuring 1495 sq. yds., situated at Omer Colony,Pahadi Shareef Road, Mamidipally Village, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R.District,even after receipt of regularisation application No. 12237 5 dated 29.08.2008 asillegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and unjustillegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and unjust
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO:36301 OF 2011)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directrespondents not to initiate proceedings for penalisation of unauthorizedconstructed building against the schedule House property of petitioner bearing Municipal No. 6-67, (Corresponding to old H.No. 5-36/2) totally admeasuring [1495]sq. yds., situated at Omer Colony, Pahadi Shareef Road, Mamidipally [Village,]Saroornagar Mandal, R.R.District, [pending ]final disposal of the above [writ ][petition]
l.A. NO: 2OF 2O11(WP MP. NO: 37817 OF 20111
Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that in the circumstances stated [in]the affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court may be [pleased to]permit the petitioners to come on record as respondents 5 to 3'1 in the above WPNo.29321 of 2O11 as well in the WPMP No.36301 oi 2011
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. KISHAN RAO MATURI
Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
t
/
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [K.SARATH]WRIT PETITION No.29321 of 201 [1]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This petition is coming lor hearing since 2011. On \7.12.2024, when the matter was called, [there was ][no]representation on behaif of the [petitioner, artd ][therefore]the matter was directed to be listed today under [the]caption "for Dismissal". Even today, when the [matter ][is]called, there is norepresentation on behalf of thepetitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested [to]prosecute this case.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed [for]
2. Non-prosecution/default. Thcre shall be no order [as ][to]costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any in this petition, shall stand closed.
SD/.T. TIRUM[ALA]ASSIT REGI
sTRAR ,/
//TRUE [COPY//]
toN OFFIC[ER]
to'', -n" Collector, office of Collector' Ranga Reddy District' R'R'District' [office ][at]
, m:1$tAt!*fi1*31o0,""' [Saroomagar Mandal' ][orrice ][at ][saroornagar']
Conclusion
, , fti [9li8"3fficer, ][M ][R'o' ][office' ][Saroornasar ][Mandal' ][office ][at ][saroomasar']ftT [?li$"jnicer, ][R.l. ][office, saroornagar ][Mandal, ][office ][at ][saroornagar'], R.R.District', fti [9li8"3fficer, ][M ][R'o' ][office' ][Saroornasar ][Mandal' ][office ][at ][saroomasar']ftT [?li$"jnicer, ][R.l. ][office, saroornagar ][Mandal, ][office ][at ][saroornagar'], R.R.District'
KKSBS v
I
\
HIGH COURTDATED:31 11212024
ORDER
WP.No.29321 ot 2011
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONFOR NON.PROSECUTIONWITHOUT COSTS
/o/,/
1 [r.lF- ][S ][lh],6a.l19 FIB;l2025tC,\.a'(-))[..ji.rT