Telangana High Court
CRP/304/2017 of G. Rachel Jayapaul, Vs V. Sreeramulu , E. Sreeramulu, on 28 December 2017
B.SIVA SANKARA RAO Civil Revision Petition No.304 of 2017 ORDER Heard both sides. The Revision is allowed permitting additional issues. So far as the additional issues formulated, the same are moulded as follows:- Whether the plaintiff is in abroad at the time the alleged payments made on
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
HON’BLE Dr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
Civil Revision Petition No.304 of 2017
Heard both sides.
The Revision is allowed permitting additional issues. So far as the additional issues formulated, the same are moulded as follows:- Whether the plaintiff is in abroad at the time the alleged payments made on 01.09.2014 and 04.09.2014 and if so, the discharge pleaded by the defendant is true?
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed.
Date:28.12.2017 vvr
_______________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J