Telangana High Court
CRP/2066/2021 of Dr.G. Venugopal Vs Smt. G. Prameela on 30 December 2021
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN CIVIL REVISION PETIT ION NO:2 066 0F 2021 Petition under Article 227 ol the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
CIVIL REVISION PETIT ION NO:2 066 0F 2021
Petition under Article 227 ol the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the orderdated07l1212021 inl.A.S.R.No.6306of 2021 in o.s.No.9 of 20l6onthefiteof theCourt of the I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad.Court of the I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad.
Between:
Pr,9 Yglrg^opal, [S/o.Late ][Sri ][G.H. Gangaiah, Aged 66 years, ]Occ. Retired Rl/o.- -H.No.1-1 ['1-193/1 ], Ground Floor, Shamlal Buildingl Begumpet, SecunOeijb;i.
...Revision Petitioner/petitioner/Defendant
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Smt. G. Prameela, W/o. Late- Dr.G. Gopalakrishna, Aged 73 years, Occ.Housewife, R/o.H.No.1-11-.193, Sri Saii<rupa, Sh,amtaieuitdi;g, ilgumpet,Hyderabad.Housewife, R/o.H.No.1-11-.193, Sri Saii<rupa, Sh,amtaieuitdi;g, ilgumpet,Hyderabad.
2. P.9.Pavan, S/o.Late Dr.G. Gopalakrishna, Aged 49 years, Occ Doctor,R/osterling Virginia, USA Rep. by his brother/dpA Hoider G. caoan. Slo. tat"Dr.G. Gopjlakrishna Aged {3 yedrs, Occ. pvt. Service, nyo.X frtoi_ii_ie3, SiiSaikrupa,Shamlal Building, Begumpet, Hyderabad.R/osterling Virginia, USA Rep. by his brother/dpA Hoider G. caoan. Slo. tat"Dr.G. Gopjlakrishna Aged {3 yedrs, Occ. pvt. Service, nyo.X frtoi_ii_ie3, SiiSaikrupa,Shamlal Building, Begumpet, Hyderabad.
3. G Gagan, Slo. lqte qr.c Gopatakishna, Aged 43 years, Occ. pvt. Service,Fl/o.H.No.1-1 1-193, Sri Saikrupa, Shamlat e"uitOing, eegumpJi, HyOera6i,i'Fl/o.H.No.1-1 1-193, Sri Saikrupa, Shamlat e"uitOing, eegumpJi, HyOera6i,i'
... Res pondents/Respondents/plai ntiffs IANO:1OF2 021
Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to stay all furtherproceedings in o.s.No.9 of 2016 on the file of I Additional chief Judge, city civilCourt, Secunderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. V. SURESH
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI VENKATESH DESHPANDE
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON( [IURABLE ][SRI ][JUSTICE ][UJJAL ][BHUYAN]
C.R.P,NO[.2066 ][0][F ][2021]
@&. fpa [r ][)n'ble ][sri ][Justice ][uiial ][Bhuvan)]
Heard [vIr.M'V.Suresh, ][leamed counsel ][for ][the ][revision]and [Mr.Venkatesh ][Deshpande' ][leamed counsel ][for ][the]petitioner respondents.
2. Revisior [petitioner ][is ][the ][defendant ][in ][the suit ][instituted]by the resporCents, [as ][plaintiffs ][i'e', ][OS'No9.of ][2()16" ][which ][is]pending on th [: ][file of ][I-Additional ][Chief ][Judge' ][City ][Civil ][Court' ][at]Secunderabad
3. Defendr nt filed [a ][petition ][under ][Section ][l0 ][of ][Civil ][Procedure]Code, 1908 [J)r ][staying ][all ][proceedings ][in ][O'S'No9 ][01' ][2016 ][titl]f [CCCA No.182 ][of ][2015, pending ][beFore ][the ][High]adjudication [t ]Court, as it [wi ][s ][contended that ][the ][subject matter ][involved ][in ][both ][the]cases was one [and ][the ][same. ][The ][said ][petition ][was numbered ][as ][I'A]of [2021. By ][order ][dated 07'12 ][2021' the ][same ][was](SR) No.630( rejected by th: [court ][below. ][Aggrieved, ][present ][revision ][petition ][has]been filed.
4At the [, ][)utset, ][we may extract the relevant ][portion ][ol ][the ][order]dated 07 .12.2" [2 ][1 ], [which ][reads ][as ][under:]
"'etitioner earlier to this [petition ][filed ][a ][petition ][U/section]10 CPC and [Order ][Xl ][Rule ][2, ][R/w Section 151 CPC paying ][the]court to [,tay ]all further [proceedings ][in ][the ][suit pending oisposal of]his appe:l in CCCA [N0.182/2015 ][on ][the file ][of ][Hon'ble High ][Court]at Hyde abad. [The said ][petition ][was ][relected ][by my ][le;arned]
Predecessorontwogrounds(1)HoWthispetitionismaintainableto stay [its ][own ][proceedings ][(2) ][Appeal ][in ][CCCA No'182/2015]does not Pertains [to this suit']
The [present petition ][is ][filed ][on 29 ][10 ][2021 U/Section 10 ][of]CPCwiththeSameprayer'withoutchallengingtheorderofrejecting the Petitionfiled IASR [No.6314/2017' Once ][an]application [is ][rejected]on the [point ][of ][maintainability ][another]petition on the [same ][grounds ][in ][the][ same court ][is ][not]AccordinglY [this]maintainable [Hence ][this ][petition ][is ][rejected]point is answered"'
5. From the [above, ][we ][lind ][that the ][interlocutory ][application ][was]dismissed [on ][the ground that earlier ][similar petition ][was dismissed ][on]29.10,2021 [and ][without ][challenging ][the ][said ][order, petitioner ][could]not have [filed ][the related ][interlocutory application']
attention [[has been ][drawn ][to ][the ][order ][at ][page ][29 ][of ][the]][[drawn ][to ][the ][order ][at ][page ][29 ][of ][the]][[to ][the ][order ][at ][page ][29 ][of ][the]][[the ][order ][at ][page ][29 ][of ][the]][[order ][at ][page ][29 ][of ][the]][[at ][page ][29 ][of ][the]][[page ][29 ][of ][the]][[29 ][of ][the]][[of ][the]][[the]]My attention
6. My attention [[has been ][drawn ][to ][the ][order ][at ][page ][29 ][of ][the]][[drawn ][to ][the ][order ][at ][page ][29 ][of ][the]][[to ][the ][order ][at ][page ][29 ][of ][the]][[the ][order ][at ][page ][29 ][of ][the]][[order ][at ][page ][29 ][of ][the]][[at ][page ][29 ][of ][the]][[page ][29 ][of ][the]][[29 ][of ][the]][[of ][the]][[the]]book [where ][from ][it ][is ][seen ][that ][I'A ][(SR) ][No'6314 ][of ][2017 ][in]paper O.S.No.9 [of ][2016 was rejected ][in ][the ][following ][manner:]
'1.How this [petition ][is ][maintainable to stay its ][own]proceedings.proceedings.
2. Appeal [CCCA'I82/15 does not ][pertain ][to this suit']
Hence [re.lected".]
'1 . Firstly, [the ][said ][order looks more ][like ][an ][endorsement ][than ][like]an order, [not ][to ][speak ][of ][a ][judicial ][order' ][No ][date ][is ][mentioned]therein. [Simply ][by ][stating ][that ][CCCA ][No ][182 ][of ][2015 ][does ][not]pertain to the [suit ][and ][questioning ][himself ][as ][to how ][the ][petition ][was]maintainable, [the ][lA ][was ][rejected' ][Such an ][order ][which is ][devoid ][of]reasons [would ][be ][non ][est ][in ][the ][eye ][of ][law' ][It ][is ][needless ][to]any reiterate the [importance ][of ][recording ][of ][reasons ][in ][the ][decisioru]
\
making [proce ][s, ][more ][particularly ][in ][a ][judicial ][proceeding; ][a ][judicial]order sans [rea ][,ons ][is ][unthinkable']
8. In the l,ght of [the ][above, impugned order ][dated ][07 ][i2'2021 ][is]set aside. [Mt ][tter ][is ][remanded back ][to the ][file ][of ][learned ][I-Additional]Chief Judge, City [Civil ][Court, ][at ][Secunderabad' ][who ][shall ][decide]I.A (SR) No. [i306 ][of ][2021 ][in ][O ][S ][No'9 ][of ][2016 afresh' ][aier ][hearing]the contestinS [parties. ][All ][contentions ][are ][kept open']
9Civil rr vision [petition ][is, ][accordingly, allowed']
10. Pendin; miscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any, shali ][stand ][closed']
1 1. No co: [:s.]
SD/-M.MANJULAASSISTANT [REGISTRAR]//TRUE [COPY//]irL--SECTION [OFFICER]
torr'
1. TheIAdditionallhiefJudge,CityCivilCourt,secunderabad,
2. One [CC ][to Sri ][N ][V ][Suresh' Advocate [OPUCI]
3. One [CC ][to ][Sri ][\:nkatesh ][Deshpande' Advocate IOPUCI]
4. Two [CD ][CoPies]5One SPare [CoP ][I]sbrt5One SPare [CoP ][I]sbrt e-t'
HIGH COURT
DATED: 301122021
ORDERCRP.No.2066 tf 2021
ALLOWING TIIE CRP
\P€>€>
:.':.(gE S i..{ i .::l! 6 ,.tti': ttlzt/\.:- _-