Telangana High Court
WP/41069/2014 of MD, HMWS AND SB, HYDERABAD AND 2 OTHERS Vs SMT.D.PREMALATHA, HYDERABAD AND ANR on 29 December 2022
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILl AND THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA.JESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 41069 OF 2014
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILlANDTHE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA.JESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 41069 OF 2014
Between:
1. Hyderabad lr,4etropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Board, Rep. by itslVlanaging Director, Khairatabad, Hyderabad-500 004.Hyderabad-500 004.lVlanaging Director, Khairatabad, Hyderabad-500 004.Hyderabad-500 004.
lVlanaging Director, Khairatabad, Hyderabad-500 004.Hyderabad-500 004.2. The General l\ilanager (Engineering), O & M Division, Khairatabad,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
3. Chief Engineer/Director (Personnel), Hyderabad Metro Water Supply &Sewerage Board, Khairatabad, Hyderabad.Sewerage Board, Khairatabad, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 IN O,A.1O7O1I2O12
AND
1. Smt. D.Premalatha, D/o. Laxmaiah, Aged about 52 years, Assistant TechnicalOfficer, O/o General l\,ilanager (Engineering) Project Division-|, HMWS andSB, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad, R:/o. H. No. 1 7-22, Krishnanagar Colony, NearSubodaya School, Dilsuknagar, Hyderabad.Officer, O/o General l\,ilanager (Engineering) Project Division-|, HMWS andSB, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad, R:/o. H. No. 1 7-22, Krishnanagar Colony, NearSubodaya School, Dilsuknagar, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT/APPLICANT IN O.A,1O7O1/2012
2. State of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, MunicipalAdministration & Urban Development Department, Secretariat Buildings,Hyderabad.Administration & Urban Development Department, Secretariat Buildings,Hyderabad.
(Respondent No-2 is not necessary party)
...RESPON DENT/RESPONDENT No.4 lN O.A.1 0701 12012
Petition under Article 226 o'f the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writof mandamus, declaring the order dated: 20-02-2014 passed by the Hon'ble A.P.Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.10701 of 2012 as illegal, unsustainable as thesame is contrary to the well established principles of law and set aside the same.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2O14(WPMP. NO: 514,430F 20141
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased tosuspend the operation of the order dt.20.o2.2o14 passed in o.A.No.1070i of 2012on the file of AP Administrative Tribunal.on the file of AP Administrative Tribunal.
cotrsel for the Fetitiorrers: sRr G.NARENDER REDDY (sc FoR HMws AND sB)Coumsel forthe Re+qrCer( No.2: Gp FOR MCPL ADMN AND URBAN DEVComsel for the Respondent No.1 : - The Court made the follorvirg: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI [JUSTICE ABHIN][AND][ KUMAR SHAVILI]
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI [JUSTICE ][NAMAVARAPU][ RAJESHWAR ][RAO]WRIT PETITION [No.41O69 ][of ][2014]
ORDER: [(Per ][tlLe ][Hon'ble ][Sri ][Ju.stice Abhinand ][Kumar ][Shautli)]
Learned counsel for [the ][petitioners ][has ][informed ][the]Court that the writ [petition ][has ][become ][infructuous']
2. In view of the [same, ][Writ ][Petition ][is ][dismissed ][as]infructuous. There [shall ][be no ][order ][as ][to costs']
3. As a sequel, [miscellaneous ][applications pending, ][if]in this Writ [Petition, shall stand ][closed']any, sD/.P.ch NAGft?HHHffi ///TRUECoPY// secJffiforrrcen 'O [,,, ,*O ]' [CCS ][tO ][GP ][FOR ][MCPL ADMN AND ][URBAN DEV, ][High ][COUTT ][fOT ][thE]siaie oi retarce!?, .'IE[dD"[Abfttot3t'lA" FoR HMWS AND sB) toPUC]2. One [CC ][to ][SRI ][G ][NA]3. Two [CD CoPies]PSK. ,/GJP ,/d HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP.No.41069 of 2014
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
k)@cr\-)[,ea]<:-.
-ii i;,,L^.Jco2 0 l[$ [2CI?3]..