Telangana High Court
WP/23880/2004 of Asma Kaleemulla, Vs The District Collector, on 28 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.23880 of 2004 Between: 1 Asma Kaleemulla, W/o. Zaki Kaleemulla, R/o. H.No. 10-1-976, A.C.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
WRIT PETITION NO.23880 of 2004
Between:
1 Asma Kaleemulla, W/o. Zaki Kaleemulla, R/o. H.No. 10-1-976, A.C. Guards, Hyderabad.
2 Sumathi, W/o. S.N. Reddy,
R/o. H.No. 8-2-684/3/7/F, Mustafanagar, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.
3 Mirza Dilawar Baig, S/o. Mirza Khursheed Baig, R/o. H.No. 8-2-684/3/8/F, Mustafanagar, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.
4 Mohd. Raziduddin Farooqui, S/o. Mohd. Sultanuddin Farooqui, R/o. H.No. 8-2-684/3/6/F, Mustafanagar, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, R/o. H.No. 8-2-684/3/6/F, Mustafanagar, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.
..... PETITIONERS
AND
1 The District Collector, Hyderabad District at Hyderabad.
2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Shaikpet, Hyderabad.
3 The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad.
....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased topass appropriate Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the peacefulpossession and enjoyment of the properties of the petitioners bearing House Nos.8-2-684/3/9/F, 8-2-684/3/7/F, 8-2-684/3/8/F, and 8-2-684/3/6/F situated in Survey No. 129/36 Mustafanagar (Slum) Road No.12 Banjara Hills, Hyderabad withoutfollowing due process of law as arbitrary, unreasonable, illegal, improper, violativeof principles of natural justice, contrary to relevant rules and further direct therespondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of above saidpremises of the petitioners without recourse to the procedure contemplated under relevant rules.Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.V.SREE RANGA RAOCounsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUEThe Court, at the admission stage, made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw thewrit petition. Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Date: 28.12.2004Nsr
_________________(N.V. RAMANA, J)..... REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //SECTION OFFICER
To
1 The District Collector, Hyderabad District at Hyderabad.
2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Shaikpet, Hyderabad.
3 The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad.
4 Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT)
5 Two CD copies.