Telangana High Court
WP/25570/2009 of Haveli Club AND Bar One Restaurant Beside Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation , on 31 December 2009
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 25570 of 2009 Between: Haveli Club & Bar One Restaurant, Beside Harsha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 25570 of 2009
Between:
Haveli Club & Bar One Restaurant, Beside Harsha Toyota Show Room, Kondapur Main Road, Kondapur, Rep. by its Partner K.V. Narasing Rao, S/o. Umapathi Rao, 34 yrs, R/o. 203, Divya Residency, Tagore Mansain, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.
AND
..... Petitioner
1 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation , Rep. by its Special Officer, &
Commissioner, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad
2 The Additional Commissioner, Advertisement Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation , Tankbund Road, Hyderabad 3 U.S.M. Business Systems Private Limited, 1-8-319/2, Patigadda Road, Behind Ford Showroom, Secunderabad.
.....Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstancesstated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order ordirection more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of therespondents in issuing the notices on 1-4-2009 vide Proceedings in serial Nos. 13623 underSection 421 R/w Section 622 of the Municipal Corporation Act 1955, treating the nameBoard/board frames fixed by the petitioner on the parapet wall of its business place andconsequently demanding the fee for the same is illegal, arbitrary capricious and in violationof the principles of natural justice.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed insupport there of and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P.SRIHARI, Advocate for thePetitioner and Smt. Kalapana Ekbote, SC for GHMC for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, theCourt made the following:
Post on 30.11.2009 in the Motion List.
In the meanwhile, there shall be interim stay for a period of two weeks.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1 The Special Officer, & Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation , Tankbund Road, Hyderabad Corporation , Tankbund Road, Hyderabad 2 The Additional Commissioner, Advertisement Greater Hyderabad Municipal 3 U.S.M. Business Systems Private Limited, 1-8-319/2, Patigadda Road, Behind Ford Showroom, Secunderabad (RR 1 to 3 by RPAD)
4. One CC to Sri P.SRIHARI, Advocate (OPUC)
5. One spare copy.
JU
HIGH COURT
LNRJ
DT. 25.11.2009
POST ON 30.11.2009 IN THE MOTION LIST.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP NO. 25570/2009
INTERIM STAY.
Drafted by JU
Dt. 27.11.2009
HIGH COURT
LNRJ
DT. 25.11.2009
POST ON 30.11.2009 IN THE MOTION LIST.
WP NO. 25570/2009
INTERIM STAY.