Telangana High Court
WP/25227/2007 of Nelapati Lakshmi Kumari, Vs The Station House Officer, on 27 December 2007
A . GOPAL REDDY AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD W.P.No.25227 of 2007 DATE: 27.12.2007 Between: Nelapati Lakshmi Kumari, W/o Rajasekhar, …. Petitioner And: Station House Officer, Town Police Station, Tanuku, West Godavari District and others …. Respondents ORDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
AND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD
W.P.No.25227 of 2007
DATE: 27.12.2007
Between:
Nelapati Lakshmi Kumari, W/o Rajasekhar,
…. Petitioner
And:
Station House Officer, Town Police Station, Tanuku,West Godavari District and others
…. Respondents
ORDER: (Per. Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy)
The petitioner-Nelapati Lakshmi Kumari, wife of Nelapati RajaSekhar sent a telegram dated 20.11.2007 to the Hon’ble the ChiefJustice alleging that some unknown persons kidnapped her husband-Raja Sekhar from their house on 20.11.2007. It is further alleged thatsome disputes were settled at Visakhapatnam by Sri Maruthi Rao,Sub. Inspector of police, Tanuku Police Station by receiving hugemoney from Visakhapatnam Real Estate people, who colluded withthe kidnapping of her husband, and hence, the said telegram hastaken up as writ petition.
In response to the notice issued by this Court, the Sub. Inspectorof Police, Tanuku Police Station, West Godavari District filed a counteraffidavit stating that the alleged detenu was shown to be as accusedNo.2 in Cr.No.741 of 2007 u/sec.420 IPC on the file of IV Town PoliceStation, Visakhapatnam, for which he was taken to the police stationfor enquiry. The respondent also filed along with counter affidavit the statement of the alleged detenu recorded by the Mandal ExecutiveMagistrate, Tanuku, which clearly discloses that he was not illegallydetained by the police at any point of time and the alleged telegramwas also not sent by his wife, who is the petitioner herein.
In view of the statement made by the alleged detenu that he wasnot illegally detained, no credence can be given to the contents of thetelegram sent by some unknown person. Hence, this writ petition isaccordingly dismissed.
____________________
A. GOPAL REDDY, J
Date: 27[th] December 2007
Ksn
_________________________G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J