Telangana High Court
WP/34128/2011 of Shaik Hanifa Vs The State rep. by its Secretary, on 29 December 2011
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.34128 of 2011 BETWEEN Shaik Hanifa and three others. ... PETITIONERS AND The
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.34128 of 2011
BETWEEN
Shaik Hanifa and three others.
... PETITIONERS
AND
The State, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat,Hyderabad and four others.
...RESPONDENTSthe Petitioners: MR. G.
Counsel for the Petitioners: MANOHAR
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE – R1 to R3 GP FOR MINES & GEOLOGY – R4 --NONE APPEARED for R5-- The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
After a detailed order has been passed today, vide proceeding sheet,the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court towithdraw the writ petition with a liberty to remove the defects and file a freshwrit petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with theliberty aforesaid, if the cause of action survives and law permits.
The Registrar (Judicial) shall, however, file a report, as per the order videproceeding sheet, notwithstanding the dismissal of the writ petition. TheRegistry shall return the original papers, if any, to the petitioners’ counselafter getting the said documents substituted by authenticated copies of thesame. There shall be no order as to costs.
December 29, 2011DSK
_____________________
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J