Telangana High Court

CRLP/8604/2018 of P.Rohith Reddy Vs M.Bhujanga Reddy on 29 December 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA' AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITI ONNO: 8604 oF 2018 Between: P.Rohith Reddv, S/o.P Vittal Reddy,aged^35 years' R/o plot No'66' Sri Lakshmi i'l;i;;

IN ' THE HIGH [COURT ][FOR ][THE STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY,THE [TWENTY NINTH ][DAY ][OF DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND [AND ][TWENTY THREE]

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE [SRI ][JUSTICE ][K.LAKSHMAN]

CRIMINAL PETITI[ONN][O: ][8604][ oF ][2018]

Between:

P.Rohith Reddv, [S/o.P ][Vittal ][Reddy,aged^35 ][years' ][R/o ][plot ][No'66' Sri ][Lakshmi]i'l;i;; b"i;t, [Manikonda, Ransa Reddv District]

..Petitioner/Accused [No.3]

AND

'l.M.Bhuianga Reddy' Rl/o. Balreddygudem ,age-d [about ][44 ][years' ][Rl/o ].B;lA;isuj;rn, [ttloininpet ][trr,no,rl ][Vit'r."oad ][District' Presentlv residins]H No.16-03-V/785' [vasanth ][NA;;,'M;Ev;i'n ][Township ]' [K P ][H'B' ][Tirumalgiri']Hyderabad.B;lA;isuj;rn, [ttloininpet ][trr,no,rl ][Vit'r."oad ][District' Presentlv residins]H No.16-03-V/785' [vasanth ][NA;;,'M;Ev;i'n ][Township ]' [K P ][H'B' ][Tirumalgiri']Hyderabad.

2.The State [of Telangana, ][Rep ][by ][its ][Public Prosecutor' ][High Court ][oI Judicature' ][At]'Hyi;r;#j,r;; th;Ete;i r"rlnslna and the state of Andhra Pradesh'

...ResPondents/ComPlainant

Petition under [Section ][482 ][of ][Cr'P ][C ][praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances]stated in the [Memorandum ][of ][Grounds ][of ][Criminal ][Petition' the ][High ][Court ][may][Jpr""l"O [to ][quash ][all further ][Proceedings ][in ][Crime No 180 ][of ][2018 ][of ][Tandur]iown [potice ]Station, [Vikarabad, ][in ][the interest ][of ][justice']

I.A NO: 10F [2020]

Between:

ThestateofTelangana,Rep.byitsPublicProsecutor'HighCourtofJudicature'Ativi""ri"diii"ilne [iGie'or ][ietangana ][and the state of Andhra Pradesh']

...Petitioner/ResPondent

AND

l.P.Rohith Reddy,S/o.P.Vittal [Reddy, ][R/o. plot No'66, Sri ][Lakshmi Nagar ][Colony']Manikonda, Ranga [Reddy ][District. ]

...RespondenUAccused2.M.Bhuianga Reddy, [S/o.M.Parma Reddy' ][R/o ][Balreddygudem ]'Mominpet [Mandal']Viiirauio [D"istrict.(Fi-z ][is ][not necessary party)]

...ResPondents/Com Plainant

Petition under [section ][482 ][of ][cr.P ][.c ][praying ][that in t1e ][circumstances]stated [in the Memorandu. ][of C'oundt ][of Crimhal ][Petition'tho High Court ][may];;';L;t; To vacate tn".t.v [granted ][in ][CrlP' ][No ][8604/20 ][18 ][on the file ][of]Hon'Ote [High Court dt:16/08/2018]

r.A. No[: ][1 ][OF 2018]

Petition under [Section ][482 ][of ][cr.P ][.c ][praying ][that in the ][circumstances]statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition'theHighCourtmaybe oleased [to ][stay ][all furtner ][proceeOings including the arrest ][of the ][petitioner ][in]3;,i,:"-N"lrio ;i [riji; ;i ][randur ][ro-wn potice starion, ][Vikarabad, ][pendins]disposal [of ][the above Criminal Petition']

This Petition [coming ][on ][for ][hearing'upon perusing ][the ][Memorandum ][of]Grounds [of criminal ][Petition ][and ][upon hearing ][the ][arguments ][of ][Sri ][T ][Anirudh]Reddy,Advocate [for ][the ][Petitioner ][and the Public ][Prosecutor ][on ][behalf ][of ][the]Respondent [No.2 ][and ][None ][Appeared ][for ][the ][Respondent ][No ][2]

The Court [made ][the ][following: ][ORDER]

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMANCRIMINAL PETITION No.8604 of 2018

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Sri T.Pradyumna Kumar Reddy, leamed Senior Counsel representingSri T.Anirudh Reddy, learned counsel for the [petitioner, ]on instructions,would submit that the Investigating Officer in Cr.No.l80 of 2018 of TandurTown Police Station, Vikarabad, on completion of investigation filed finalreport under Section [173 ]of Cr.P.C. stating that the matter is civiI in natureNo protest [petition ]is filed against the same. Therefore, nothing remains inthe present criminal [petition ]to adjudicate further and the cause in thiscriminal petition has become infructuous In view of the above submission, this Criminal Petition is dismissedas infructuous. Miscellaneous [petitions, ]if any, [pending ]in this criminalpetition, shall stand closed.

SD/.A.V.S. PRASADASSISTANT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//sEcTtoOFFICER

To,1. The JFCM Tandur at Tandur of Vikarabad [District of Telangana.]2. The Station House Otficer, P.S.Tandur [Tn, ][Vikarabad.]3. One CC to SRl. T S Anirudh Reddy Advocate [OPUC]4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor , [High ]Court [for ]the [State of Telangana.[OUT]]5. Two CD CopiesGHMYW

HIGH COURT

DATED:2911212023

ORDER

CRLP.No.8604 of [2018]

DISMISSING THE CRL.PETITION

AS INFRUCTUOUS.

r.p(caaX{-

t[c][ g ][THE ][5][ ).]J)17 tntn o2,124 !-+J),\\i)r\'r'4 ia H i:Ll *

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead