Telangana High Court
WP/4333/2018 of A.P. High Court Employees Mutually Aided Co-operative Housing Socieity Limited, Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Police on 28 December 2018
JUSTICE SRI THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT W.P.No.4333 OF 2018 ORDER: (ORAL) (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice S.V.Bhatt) The writ prayer reads as follows:- ….this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or directions particularly
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
W.P.No.4333 OF 2018
ORDER: (ORAL)(Perthe Hon’ble Sri Justice S.V.Bhatt)
The writ prayer reads as follows:-
….this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or directions particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 1 and 2 in not making any efforts to control the Law and Order by protecting the Petitioner and its members as well property of the Society i.e., land situated at Sy.No.25 part 1-9, Kancha Gachibowli from the high hand unsocial elements as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, much less unconstitutional, in the interest of justice and to pass…”
This Court prima facie is of the view that the petitioner Society invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 for general directions to the respondents. The petitioner claims to be a Society registered under the Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act. The right of petitioner, if is interfered with or disturbed the petitioner ought to institute substantive proceedings either under the bye-laws and/ or before the Court of competent jurisdiction.
The averments in the affidavit do not persuade us to grant the relief as prayed for. However, liberty to move the competent Court or invoke its power under the Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act or bye-laws is preserved.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed by preserving the liberty as granted above. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, stand closed.
__________________________________ THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, CJ
____________
S.V.BHATT, J
28[th] December, 2018 Prv