Telangana High Court
WP/8508/2021 of Sri Sai Krupa Catering and Maintenance Services, Vs The State of Telangana on 30 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY , THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR Sri Sai Krupa Catering and Maintenance Services, Rl/o H.No.'1-8-43, Rajendra Nagar, Hyderabad. Rep by Sri N
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 8508 OF 2021
Between:
Sri Sai Krupa Catering and Maintenance Services, Rl/o H.No.'1-8-43, RajendraNagar, Hyderabad. Rep by Sri N Rajender Prasad, S/o N Venkaiah, Aged: 4Syears,Fl/o H No. 1-8-43, Rajender Nagar, Apert Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by [jts ]Principal Secretary for Panthayat Raj AndRural development, SRTGN Bhavan, Erramanzil Colony, Hyderabad.Rural development, SRTGN Bhavan, Erramanzil Colony, Hyderabad.2. The State of Telangana, lnstitution of Rural Development I Rep. by itsCommissioner, Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Hyderabad.Commissioner, Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Hyderabad.3. The State of Telangana lnstitution of Rural Development, Rep. by its ChiefExecutive Officer, Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Hyderabad.Executive Officer, Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Hyderabad.
4. The State of Telangana, lnstitution of Rural Development, Rep. by its JointDirector (Administration), Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Hyderabad....RESPONDENTSDirector (Administration), Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Hyderabad....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasedto issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus, declaring that the action of the 3rd respondent, in issuing the OfficeOrder No. 1084/A3/ESTT/TSIRD/2016, dated 30.03.2021, keeping the petitioner-firmin block list for a period of 5 years, without giving notice or an opportunity to thepetitioner to represent its case, unilaterally cancelling the agreement dated18.11.2019, with effect from 01.04.2021, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the termsand conditions of the Agreementv executed by the 4th respondent with thepetitioner-firm, violative of principles of natural justice, violative of Articles 14 and 21of the constitution of lndia and set aside the same, by holding that the petitioner iseligible and entitled to continue service of sri sai Krupa catering and MaintenanceServices, as per the Agreement dated 18.1 1.2019.
lA NO: 1 OF 202't
Petition und,'r section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed rr support of the petition, the High court may be pleased tosuspend the opera ion of the Office Order No. 1084/A3/ESTT/TSIRD/2016, dated30.03.2021, issued :y the 3rd respondent, with a direction to the 3rd respondent, tocontinue the Sri Sai Krupa Catering and Maintenance services, as perthe,Agreement datr d 18.11.2019, pending disposal of the above writ petition,pending disposal of he above writ petition.continue the Sri Sai Krupa Catering and Maintenance services, as perthe,Agreement datr d 18.11.2019, pending disposal of the above writ petition,pending disposal of he above writ petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Betwee n:
'1 . The State of Tr langana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary for Panthayat Raj AndRural developr rent, SRTGN Bhavan, Erramanzil Colony, Hyderabad.Rural developr rent, SRTGN Bhavan, Erramanzil Colony, Hyderabad.2. The State of Tr langana, lnstitution of Rural Development I Rep. by itsCommissioner, Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Hyde'abad.Commissioner, Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Hyde'abad.3. The State of Tr langana lnstitution of Rural Development, Rep. lry its ChiefExecutive Offic rr, Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar Mandal Hyderabad.Executive Offic rr, Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar Mandal Hyderabad.4. The State of Te angana, lnstitution of Rural Development, Rep. by its JointDirector (Admir stration), Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar l/an,lal, Hyderabad.Director (Admir stration), Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar l/an,lal, Hyderabad.
...Petitioners/Respondents
...Petitioners/Respondents
AND
Sri Sai Krupa Ca ering and Maintenance Services, R/o H.No.1-B-43, RajendraNagar,Hyderabad. lep by Sri N Rajender Prasad, S/o N Venkaialr, Aged: 45yearsR/o H No. 1-8-43, F ajender Nagar, Apert Ranga Reddy District
...RespondenUPetitioner
Petition under Ser tion 151 CPC [praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances ][stated ][in ][the]affidavit filed in suppo t of the [petition, ][the ][High ][court ][may be ][pleas,:d ][to ][vacate ][the]interim order dated 06, )4t2021 [Made ][in lA.No.1/2021 ][in ][wP ][No.8508 0f ][2021 ][.]
Counsel for the Petiti< [ner: ][SRl. ][CH ][VENKAT ][RAMAN]
Counsel for the Respc [ndents: ][THE ][ADDL ][ADVOCATE ][GENERAL ][FOR]GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ AND [RURAL ][DEVELOPMENT]
The Court made the [fo ][lowing: ][ORDER]
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T, VINOD KUMAR
Writ Petition No.E5O8 of 2O2l
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letterdt.2o.l2.2o2l to the Registrar(Judicial) High Court for thedt.2o.l2.2o2l to the Registrar(Judicial) High Court for theState of Telangana at Hyderabad, seeking permission towithdraw this Writ Petition stating that the respondents havewithdraw this Writ Petition stating that the respondents haveagreed to remove the petitioner-Firm from blacklist and settlethe pending bills of the petitioner. However, liberty is soughtthe pending bills of the petitioner. However, liberty is soughtby the petitioner to approach this Court in the event thematter is not settled with the respondents.
2. Cranting liberty as sought for, this Writ petition isdismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
3. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,shall stand closed.
SD/-T.TIRUMALA [DEVI]ASSISTANT [REGISTRAR]vSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY/i
SECTION OFFICER
To't. On" CC to SRl. CH VENKAT RAMAN Advocate [OPUC]
z. One CC to SRl. [ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL (TG) Advocate ][toPUCl ]-3.TwoCCstoGPforPanchayatRajandRuralDevelopment,HighCourtfortheState of Telangana [at Hyderabad' ][OUT]4. Two CD CoPies
5. One Spare [Copy]
,IR
BS\\-\>
DATED:3011212021
ORDERWP.No.8508 [of ][2021]
DISMISSING [T}IE WRIT ][PETITION ].aIwitroRA\A [N ][wlrHour ][cosrs]
\iwtt^i.t,
1p ?- [sl ][Al'€]o.'i/./.,.)0s [l[i{20?],J,/