Telangana High Court
CRLA/717/2005 of The Public Prosecutor Vs Palepogu Moshe on 24 December 2007
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE : D.S.R. VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE : K.C. BHANU CRL.A. No. 717 of 2005 (Criminal Appeal under Section 378 (3) & (1) of Cr.P.C.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN
: PRESENT :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE : D.S.R. VARMAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE : K.C. BHANUCRL.A. No. 717 of 2005
(Criminal Appeal under Section 378 (3) & (1) of Cr.P.C. against thejudgment of the court of the II Addl. District & Sessions Judge, ( Fast TrackCourt), Ongole passed in SC. No. 436 of 1995 dated 07-06-2003.)
Between:
The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad
AND
Appellant
1. Palepogu Moshe, S/o Gangaiah
2. Palepogu Parishudham, s/o Moshe
3. Palepogu Koteswara Rao, S/o Moshe
4. Palepogu Prabhudass, S/o Mohse
5. Palepogu Yohan, S/o Gangaiah
6. Palepogu Samson, S/o Yohan
7. Palepogu Purushotham, S/o Yohan
8. Palepogu Polaiah, S/o Gangaiah
9. Palepogu Yesu, S/o Pedda Narsaiah
10. Palepogu Suleman, S/o Polaiah
11. Palepogu Anemma, W/o Parishudam
( All are R/o Madhavaram Village, Thalluru Mandal, Harijanawada-Madiga)
Respondents
The Petition coming on for orders upon perusing the grounds filed herein,and upon hearing the arguments of the Public Prosecutor for the Respondent, theCourt made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned Public Prosecutor represents that notices have not yetbeen served against respondents 4 and 9.
From the record, it could be seen that the other accused whowere served with notices are not being represented by any counsel.
Hence, the Court below is directed to initiate proceedings underSection 390 Cr.P.C., if not, the proceedings under Section 482 CrP.C.shall also be initiated.
To
1. The II Addl. District & Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court) Ongole, PrakasamDistrictDistrict
2. Two CC’s to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P, Hyderabad (OUT)
3. The Section officer, Criminal Section, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad
4. Two Spare Copies
Skm
HIGH COURT
DSRV,J & KCB,J
DATE: 10-09-2007
ORDER
DIRECTION
Drafted by: skmDrafted on: 12-09-2007
HIGH COURT
DSRV,J & KCB,J
DATE: 10-09-2007
ORDER
CRL.A. NO. 717 OF 2005