Rhett Precedent

Telangana High Court

CCCA/88/1988 of STATE BANK OF HYD. GUNFUNDRY HYD. Vs SHRI K. SANKAR AND ANOTHER on 31 December 1996

SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO C.C.C.A.No.88 of 1988 JUDGMENT On 2.4.2013, none appeared and there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for judgment”. Again on 4.4.2013, there was no representation on

Conclusion

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO

C.C.C.A.No.88 of 1988

JUDGMENT

On 2.4.2013, none appeared and there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the matterwas directed to be listed under the caption “for judgment”. Againon 4.4.2013, there was no representation on behalf of theappellant. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing,none appears and there is no representation on behalf of theappellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested inprosecuting the matter.

Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

There shall be no order as to costs.

_______________________

N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO,J

8[th] April, 2013rkk

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead