Telangana High Court
WP/38563/2013 of Veeramalla Koti Lingam, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 December 2013
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.38563 of 2013 Date:30.12.2013 Between: Veeramalla Koti Lingam, S/o Sailu and two others. ..... Petitioners And: The Govt of AP, reptd by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad and another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.38563 of 2013
Date:30.12.2013
Between: Veeramalla Koti Lingam,S/o Sailu and two others.
..... Petitioners
And:
The Govt of AP, reptd by its Principal Secretary, RevenueDepartment, Hyderabad and another.
.....Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Gajanand ChakravarthiCounsel for the Respondents: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following:ORDER:
The grievance of the petitioners in this Writ Petitionis that their application, dated 28.08.2013, made torespondent No.2 for survey of the land admeasuringAcs.5.00 in Survey No.369/8 of Garmilla Village,Mancherial Mandal, Adilabad District, is not beingconsidered.
In support of their plea that they have applied torespondent No.2 for survey, the petitioners have filed acopy of the On-line application, dated 28.08.2013, bypaying a sum of Rs.285/- towards marking Field Line (F-line) and making sub-division.
At the hearing, the learned Assistant GovernmentPleader for Revenue (Telangana area) submitted that inview of the, prima facie, evidence, respondent No.2 may be given an appropriate direction.
Accordingly, respondent No.2 is directed toconsider the petitioners’ application, dated 28.08.2013and initiate the process of survey, if he has alreadyreceived the application, for fixation of the F-line (Fieldline)/sub-division and complete the same within a periodof two months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisorder. If respondent No.2 finds any legally sustainablereasons for not undertaking the above-mentionedprocess, he shall communicate the same in writing to thepetitioners immediately.
Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition isdisposed of.
As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition,W.P.M.P.No.47931 of 2013 filed by the petitioners forinterim relief is disposed of as infructuous.
____________________________
JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNAREDDY
30[th]December, 2013DR