Telangana High Court

WP/16880/2019 of Sriramnagar Colony Welfare Association Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation on 30 December 2021

Cites 0, Cited by 0

DAY OF DECEI/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER WRIT PETITION NO: 16880 OF 2019 Between: Sriramna G. Trina 500050 gar Colony Welfare Association, Rep. by its General . Secretary t-h, Regd. Office at Sriramnagar Colony, Chandanagar, Hyderabad-

I

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA; AT HYDERABAD(Special Original J urisd iction)

THURSDAY. THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEI/BERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM [AKTHER]

WRIT PETITION NO: 16880 OF 2019

Between:Sriramnagar Colony Welfare Association, Rep. by its General . SecretaryG. Trinat-h, Regd. Office at Sriramnagar [Colony, Chandanagar, ][Hyderabad-]500050Sriramnagar Colony Welfare Association, Rep. by its General . SecretaryG. Trinat-h, Regd. Office at Sriramnagar [Colony, Chandanagar, ][Hyderabad-]500050

...PETITIONER

AND

1. The Greater Hyderabad l\,4unicipal [Corporation, Hyderabad ][rqp. by its]Commissioner, CC Complex, Tank [Bund Road, ][Lower ][Tank Bund, ][Hyderabad-]500063.

2. The Deputy Commissioner, [west Zone, Sherilingampally, Circle ][No ][21 ][,]Sherilinampally, Ranga [Reddy ][District.]Sherilinampally, Ranga [Reddy ][District.]3. The Assistant City [Planner, ][West Zone, Sherilinampally, Circle ][No. 21,]Sherilinampally, Ranga Reddy District.Sherilinampally, Ranga Reddy District.

4. The Assistant City Planner, [Greater Hyderabad ][l\,4unicipal ][Colporation, ][CC]Complex, Tank Bund Road, [Lower ][Tank Bund, ][Hyderabad-500063.]Complex, Tank Bund Road, [Lower ][Tank Bund, ][Hyderabad-500063.]

5. Kishore Varma Pothuri, [S/o. ][P. Narshima ][Raju, ][Aged ][about 56 years, ][Occ- ][RMP]Doctor, Ryo. H.No.2-107t2t1, [plot ][No.29, ][Sreeramnagar colony, ][Chandanagar,]S herilingampa [lly, ][R.R. ][District.]Doctor, Ryo. H.No.2-107t2t1, [plot ][No.29, ][Sreeramnagar colony, ][Chandanagar,]S herilingampa [lly, ][R.R. ][District.]

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the [Constitution ][of ][lndia ][praying ][that ][in ][the]circumstances stated [in ]the [affidavit filed therewith, ][the ][High Court may be pleased ][to]issue the writ of mandamus [or any other writs declaring ][the ][action of ][the ][respondents]in not stopping the unauthorised [and ][illegal construction based on ][the ][applications ][of]the [petitioner ]against the [respondent ][No.4 ][in ][the plot ][bearing ][No.28 ][and 30 ][and]consequently direct the respondents [to ][demolised ][the ][unauthorised, ][illegal]construction and take [necessary ][action ][against ][the ][official ][respondents ][who ][are]responsible for the [illegal construction of ][the ][5 ][floor ][building at ][the ][plot No. 28 and ][30]al Sreeramnagar colony, [Chandanagar, Sherilingampally, Rangareddy ][District,]

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section [151 CPC praying ][that ][in ][the circumstances stated in the]affidavit filed in support of [the ][petition, ][the ][High ][Court may ][be ][pleased ][to ][direct ][the]respondents to consider the application [submitted ][to ][the ][respondents ][by ][the]petitioner pending disposal of the above [writ ][petition.]

Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit thepetitioner lo amend the cause title address of the respondent No. 5 by replacing thePlot No. 29 with Plot No. 28.

Counsel for the Petitloner: SRI THAKUR RATAN SINGHCounsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: SRI SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY,SC FOR GHIMC

counsel for the Respondent No.5: sRl ch.s.R.KRlsHNAM RAJU

The Court made the following: ORDER

t

I

THE HON.BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

WRIT PETITION No.16880 OF 2019

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of lhe Constitution ofInd ia,is filed by the petitioner, wherein the following prayer ismade:

"... to issue the writ of mandamus or any other writsdeclaring the action of the respondents in not stoppingthe unauthorised and illegal construction based on theapplications of the [petitioner ]against the respondent No.4in the plot bearing No.28 & 30 and consequently directthe respondents to demolish the unauthorised, lllegalconstruction and take necessary action against the officialrespondents who are responsible for the illegalconstruction of the 5 floor building at the plot No. 28 & 30at sTeeTamnagar co ony, Chandanagar, Sherilingampally,Rangareddy dist., and to [pass ]such other order or orders 2, Heard the learned counsel for both sides and [perused ]therecord.

3, The grievance of the petitioner is that though it made severalrepresentation s, alleglng violation of the building [permlssion ]byrespondent No.5 and seeking removal of the unauthorizedconstruction made by the respondent No.5 over the subjectproperty, no action has been taken so far.

4. Learned Standing Counsel for GHMC would submit that therepresentation, dated 18.02.2019, of the [petitioner ]would [be]examined and dealt with, in accordance with law.

5, The said submission of the learned Standing Counsel [for]GHMC is taken on record.

6. Since the respondent-corporation is contemplating to takenecessary action on the representation, dated 18.02.2019, of thepetitioner, in accordance with law, no orders are required to bepassed in this Writ Petition. However, it is made clear that therespondent-corporatio n shall complete the whole exercise within aperiod of three (3) months from the date of receipt oF a copy of thisorder.

7. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed ofluliscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petitionshall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.SD/.K.AMMAJIASSISTANT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//,[\,,.SECTION OFFICERTo,1 . The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad rep. by itsCommissioner, CC Complex, Tank Bund Road, Lower Tank Bund, Hyderabad-500063.2. The Deputy Commissioner, wesl Zone, Sherilingampally, Circle No. 21,Sherilinampally, Ranga Reddy District.3. The Assistant City Planner, West Zone, Sherilinampally, Circle No. 21,Sherilinampally, Ranga Reddy District.4. The Assistant City Planner, Greater Hyderabad I\,4unicipal Corporation, CCComplex, Tank Bund Road, Lower Tank Bund, Hyderabad-500063.5. One CC to SRI THAKUR RATAN SINGH, Advocate [OPUC]6. One CC to SRI SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY, SC for GHI\4C [OPUC]7. One CC to SRI Ch,S.R.KRISHNAI\,{ RAJU, Advocate [OPUC]8. Two C.D. Copies.9. One Spare Copy.IV RCBS\ \-- DATED:3011212021

ORDERWP.No.16880 of 2019

DISPOSTNG OF THE [WRIT ][PETITION]WITHOUT COSTS\f,'),'),\

Ik\E [sTA][ ftr.]<Jri3()25rtuzyf*

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead