Telangana High Court
WP/26694/1999 of Jonnalagadda Sampat Kumar Vs The Member Secretary, on 29 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 26694 of 1999 Between: Jonnalagadda Sampat Kumar, S/o Late Venkataiah, R/o
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO
WRIT PETITION NO : 26694 of 1999
Between:
Jonnalagadda Sampat Kumar, S/o Late Venkataiah, R/o H.No.2-2-333, Kishanpura, Nehrunagar, Hanumakonda, Warangal District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Member Secretary, A.P.TRANSCO Vidyut Soudha, Erramanzil, Hyderabad.
2 The Superintending Engineer (Operation Circle), A.P.TRANSCO, Warangal District.
3 The Divisional Engineer(Elect), A.P.TRANSCO (Operation), Warangal.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate order or direction in the nature of writdeclaring the action of the respondents for not considering the petitioner forcompassionate appointment is illegal arbitrary and violative of principles of naturaljustice further direct the respondents to consider the petitioner for compassionateappointment forthwith in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MS.P.A.KAMALESWARI
Counsel for the Respondents: MR.S.RAVINDRANATH
The Court made the following ORDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of thiscourt to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
________________
B.Prakash Rao, J
Date: 29.12.2004
Ka
To
1 The Member Secretary, A.P.TRANSCO Vidyut Soudha, Erramanzil, Hyderabad. Vidyut Soudha, Erramanzil, Hyderabad.
2 The Superintending Engineer (Operation Circle), A.P.TRANSCO, Warangal District.
3 The Divisional Engineer(Elect), A.P.TRANSCO (Operation), Warangal. Warangal.
4 Two CD copies