Telangana High Court
WP/29297/2009 of Malepati Leelavathamma Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer, on 31 December 2009
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.29297 of 2009 Date: 31st December, 2009 Between: Malepati Leelavathamma .. Petitioner And The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kavali, Nellore district & others. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
Date: 31[st] December, 2009
Between:
Malepati Leelavathamma
And
.. Petitioner
The Revenue Divisional Officer,Kavali, Nellore district & others.
.. Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
According to the petitioner, she is the owner of land admeasuring Ac.5-00 cents in Sy.No.191-1 situated at Kothapeta village, Kaligiri mandal,Nellore district. The said land was assigned in her favour by the secondrespondent vide File No.64A/1408, dated 28.12.1998 and since then she hasbeen in possession and enjoyment of the same and her name has beenmutated in the revenue records and further pattedar passbooks and titledeeds were also issued in her favour. Earlier, petitioner also filedW.P.No.1322 of 2009 before this Court questioning the action of the secondrespondent in interfering with her possession. The said writ petition wasdisposed of directing the authorities to take action as per law.
While the matter stood thus, according to the petitioner, on 8.8.2005 thesecond respondent issued pattedar passbooks and title deeds in respect ofsubject property in favour of third respondent even though the petitioner was already having valid patta and the said patta has not been cancelled as oftoday. On coming to know about the same, petitioner immediately filedappeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer. According to the petitioner,neither the appeal is taken up nor the stay petition filed along with the appealhas been disposed of till date.
Under those circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits,the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kavali, Nellore district is directed to disposeof the appeal purported to have been filed by the petitioner being aggrievedby the orders passed by the second respondent-Tahsildar, Kaligiri mandal onits own merits including as to its maintainability and limitation and passappropriate orders, as per law, within a period of four weeks from the date ofreceipt of this order after putting third respondent and other interestedpersons on notice.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs.
______________
Date: 31.12.2009DA
C.V.RAMULU, J
31.12.2009