Telangana High Court
WP/34980/2023 of Marapaka Pushpa Latha Vs The State of Telangana on 29 December 2023
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 34980 OF 2023 Between: '1. Marapaka Pushpa Latha, D/o. Rayamaflu, Aged about. 36 years, Occ.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 34980 OF 2023
Between:
'1. Marapaka Pushpa Latha, D/o. Rayamaflu, Aged about. 36 years, Occ. HouseWife, H.No.1-105, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 53,Mancherial District.Wife, H.No.1-105, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 53,Mancherial District.
2. Marapaka Dhanalakshmi, D/o. Ra/amallu, Aged about . 35 [years, ]Occ. Hou.Wife, H.No.1-105, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 53,Mancherial District.Wife, H.No.1-105, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 53,Mancherial District.3. Ramilla Bharathi, D/o. Dharmaiah, Aged about.43 years, Occ. House Wife,H.No.1-103, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 299, MancherialDistrict.H.No.1-103, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 299, MancherialDistrict.
4. Marapaka Rajeswari, D/o. Gattaiah, Aged about . 35 [years, ]Occ. House Wife,H.No. 1-106, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 303, MancherialDistrict.H.No. 1-106, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 303, MancherialDistrict.
5. Aktapuram Venkatamma, D/o: Pocham, Aged about . 37 [years, ]Occ. HouWife, H.No.2-4, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 400, MancherialDistrict.Wife, H.No.2-4, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 400, MancherialDistrict.
6. Marapaka Padma, D/o. Bheemaiah, Aged about.43 [years, ]Occ. HouseWife,H.No.2-71, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 94, MancherialDistrict.H.No.2-71, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 94, MancherialDistrict.
7. Aktapram Rajeswari, D/o. Pocham, Aged about.34 [years, ]Occ. HouseWife,H.No.2-4, Thallapally Village, Naspur [t{andal, SES No. 400, MancherialDistrict.H.No.2-4, Thallapally Village, Naspur [t{andal, SES No. 400, MancherialDistrict.
8. Ramilla Sarada, D/o. Dharmiah, Aged about . 38 [years, ]Occ. [House ][Wife,]H.No.1-103, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES [No. ]299, [Mancherial]District.H.No.1-103, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES [No. ]299, [Mancherial]District.
9. Bandari Kavitha, D/o. Bapu, Aged about [. ]36 [years, ]Occ. House [Wife, ][H.No.1-]l0.Marapaka 89/3, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES Sardda, D7o. Rajaiah, Aged about No. . 36 275, Mancherial [years, ]Occ. House [District. ][Wife,],H.No.1-107/1, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 54, [Mancherial]District.l0.Marapaka 89/3, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES Sardda, D7o. Rajaiah, Aged about No. . 36 275, Mancherial [years, ]Occ. House [District. ][Wife,],H.No.1-107/1, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 54, [Mancherial]District.
11. lngu Lalitha, D/o. Balaiah, Aged about . 47 [yearc, ]Occ. House Wife, H.No.3-55-, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 143, Mancherial [Districl.]55-, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 143, Mancherial [Districl.]l2.Aktapuram Vi:nkatahma, D/o. Bhanaiah, Aged about. 36 [years, ][Occ. ][House]Wife, H.No.1-108, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. [306,]Mancherial District....PETITIONERSWife, H.No.1-108, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. [306,]Mancherial District....PETITIONERS
AND1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Land AcquisitionDepartment), Secretariat, Hyderabad.1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Land AcquisitionDepartment), Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Mancherial District.3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mancherial [Revenue Division, ][Mancherial]District.3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mancherial [Revenue Division, ][Mancherial]District.
4. The Tahsildar, Naspur Mandal, Ivlancherial [District.]
5. The General Manager, Area, Ivlancherial District., Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Srirampur
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of writMandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 3 to 4 in not conductingenquiry to include the names of the petitioners in the social economic surveyreport to extend the RandR benefits like wages and house site pattas to thepetitioners as per the order dated 14-03-2022 in Writ Petition No.14220 of 2020 byconsidering the petitioners representation dated 14-1 1-2O23 and also in pursuanceof the proceedings in Rc.No. C2021 4t8612O22 dated 22-11-2022 of the 2odrespondent is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law, apart from violation of principlesof natural [justice, ]besides violation of Articles 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitutionof lndia and consequently direct the respondents No. 3 and 5 to consider therepresentation dated 14-1 1-2023 of the petitioners to include the names of thepetitioners in the social economic survey report to extend the RandR benefits likewages and house site pattas to the petitioners as per the order dated 14-03-2022in Writ Petition No.14220 of 2O2O.
lA NO: ['t ]OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directthe respondents No- 3 and 5 to consider the representation dated 14-11-2023 ofthe petitioners to include the names of the petitioners in the social economicsurvey report to extend the RandR benefits like wages and house site pattas to thepetitioners as per the order dated 14-O3-2O22 in Writ Petition No.14220 ot 2O2O,pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI N INDRASENA REDDYCounsel for the Respondent No.l: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITIONCounsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: GP FOR REVENUECounsel for the Respondent No.S: SRI P. SRI HARSHA REDDY, SCThe Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.3498O of 2o23ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking the following reliet "...to issue o uit, order or direction more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaing the actionof the respondent Nos.3 to 4 in nol conducting enquiry toinclude the names of the petitioners in the SociaL EconomicSurueg report to extend the R&R benefits like utages andhouse site pattos to the petitioners as per the order dated14.03.2022 in Wit Petition No.14220 of 2O2O bgconsideing the petfiioners' representation dated14.11.2023 and also in pursuance of tLe proceedings inRc.No.C2O214/86/2022 doted 22.11.2022 of *Lerespondent No.2 is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to laut,apatt from uiolation of prtnciples of natural [justice, ]besidesuiolation of Articles 14, 21 ond 3O0-A of the Constitution ofIndia and consequentlg direct the respondents Nos.3 and5 to consider the representation doted 14.11.2023 of thepetitioners to incLude the nomes of the petitioners in theSogial Dconomic Surueg report to extend the R&R benefitstlik{wages and house site pattas to the petitioners os perthe order dated 14.03.2022 in Wit Petition No.14220 of2020..."
F
F
2. Heard [learned ][counsel ][appea-ring ][for ][the]petitioners, [and ][learned ][Government ][Pleader ][for ][Land]Acquisition [appearirlLg ][for the ][respondent ][No'1' ][learned]Government [Pleader ][for ][Revenue ][appearing ][for ][the]respondent [Nos'2 ][to ][4 ][and ][Sri ][P'Sri Harsha ][Reddy']learnedStandingCounselappearingforrespondentNo.5.
3. In [view ][of ][the ][submissions made ][by the ][learned]counsel [appearrng ][for ][the ][petitioners' ][without ][going]intomeritsofthecase,thisWritPetitionisdisposedofwithadirectiontotherespondentstodisposeoftherepresentation [hled ][by the petitioners ][on ][14' ][ll'2023 ][by]considering [the ][orders ][passed ][by this ][Court ][dated]14.O3.2O22 [in ][W.P'No'14220 ][of ][2020' ][within ][eight ][(8)]weeks from [the ][date ][of ][receipt ][of ][copy ][of ][this ][order']There shall [be ][no ][order ][as to costs']I
4. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212023
ORDERWP.No.34980 of 2OZ3
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS.
GqiorGlcc--
r\5 [STAI]€q7_oo[ / rtB 2024C,i.\iDL'sPrrta'':ort