Telangana High Court
WA/1318/2006 of Ch. L. Narasimha Rao S/o Sri narasimham Vs A.P. State Road Transport Corportion Reptd. by its on 26 December 2006
MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO.1318 of 2006 26th December 2006 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 16.06.2004 in W.P.NO.28337 OF 1996 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Ch.L.Narasimha Rao,
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO
And
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT APPEAL NO.1318 of 2006
26[th] December 2006
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Orderdated 16.06.2004 in W.P.NO.28337 OF 1996 on the file of the HighCourt.)
Between:
Ch.L.Narasimha Rao, S/o.Sri Narasimham, 44 years, H.No.23/266,Pendemvari Street, Fathekhanpet, Nellore.
…APPELLANT
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. A.P.State Road Transport Corporation, Rep.by its ViceChairman Managing Director, Musheerabad.Chairman Managing Director, Musheerabad.
And two others.
…RESPONDENTS
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO
And
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT APPEAL NO.1318 of 2006
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble Mr Justice B.Prakash Rao)
This matter came on 20.12.2006, on which day none appearednor there was any representation on behalf of the appellant. Even today, none appears nor there is any representation on behalf of the appellant.
Hence, the Writ Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
_________________
(B.PRAKASH RAO, J)
_______________________
(RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J)
26[th] December 2006RRB