Telangana High Court
WP/24384/2004 of T.Varalaxmi, Vs The Divisional Manager, on 28 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 24384 of 2004 Between: T.Varalaxmi, W/o. late T.V. Reddy, Aged 45 years,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANUWRIT PETITION NO : 24384 of 2004
Between:
T.Varalaxmi, W/o. late T.V. Reddy,
Aged 45 years, R/o.1-6-141/35/613,
Sriram Nagar, Suryapet,
Nalgonda District
AND
..... PETITIONER
The Divisional Manager,
A.P.S.R.T.C., Suryapet, Nalgonda District.
.....RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus declaring the action of the respondent herein in not considering theAppeal/Representation submitted by the petitioner herein dated 11.6.2004 againstthe removal order, dated 30.8.2003 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional andconsequently direct the respondent to consider the Appeal/Representatiion, dated11.6.2004 which is pending and pass appropriate order.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.R.TAGORE (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondent: MR.V.T.M.PRASAD
The Court at the admission stage, made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a Mandamus todeclare the action of the respondent in not considering theappeal/representation, dated 11.6.2004 submitted by the petitioneragainst the removal order, dated 30.8.2003 passed by the DepotManager, Kodada Depot removing the husband of the petitioner fromservice on the ground of his unauthorized absence from duty, asillegal and arbitrary.
None appeared for the petitioner.
Heard the learned standing counsel for the respondents and perusedthe material available on record.
A domestic enquiry was conducted against the husband of thepetitioner for certain irregularities. As the disciplinary authorityaccepted the enquiry report, he ordered removal of the husband ofthe petitioner from service. Challenging the same, the petitioner filedan appeal before the respondent on 11.6.2004. An appropriatedecision has to be taken by the respondent on the appeal filed by thepetitioner in accordance with law.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem itappropriate to direct the respondent to pass appropriate orders on the appeal/representation, dated 11.6.2004 submitted by the writpetitioner in accordance with law, within a period of two months fromthe date of receipt of a copy of this order.
The writ petitioner is disposed of in terms of the above direction. Inthe circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs.
______________
(K.C. BHANU,J.)
28[th] December, 2004.
bcj
To
1 The Divisional Manager,
A.P.S.R.T.C., Suryapet, Nalgonda District.
2 Two C.D. copies