Telangana High Court
WP/38338/2014 of Jakkilinki Sanjeeva Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 December 2014
P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.38338 of 2014 ORDER: Heard. The case of the petitioner is that he and his wife purchased the property to an extent of 4259.15 sq. yards out of Ac.1.47 cents with ACC sheds bearing Dr.No.14-11-23, 14-11-24, 14-11-25 in Assessment Nos.1088/20237, 20238 and 20239
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAOWRIT PETITION No.38338 of 2014
Heard.
The case of the petitioner is that he and his wife purchased theproperty to an extent of 4259.15 sq. yards out of Ac.1.47 cents with ACCsheds bearing Dr.No.14-11-23, 14-11-24, 14-11-25 in AssessmentNos.1088/20237, 20238 and 20239 covered in Survey No.84/1 and also toan extent of 2855.65 sq. yards out of Ac.1.47 cents with ACC shed bearingDr.No.14-11-22, assessment No.1088/20236 in Survey No.84/1.
2. The petitioner traces history of the flowing of title to the vendor’s andcontends that the property is a private property. The property was regularizedby the Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation by orders dated11.02.2011 and that it has no objection. The petitioner, when approached theSub-registrar and presented deeds of conveyance in respect of the saidproperty, he refused to process the same. Hence this writ petition is filed.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that irrespective of thestatus of the land, the Sub-Registrar cannot refuse to receive the document atthe threshold. However, no material is brought on record to show thatdocument was presented and same is refused.
4. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions, this Writ Petition isdisposed of at the admission stage, granting liberty to the petitioner to presentthe deeds of conveyance before the Sub-Registrar. As and when such deedsof conveyance are presented, the Sub-Registrar shall receive and processthe same in accordance with Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian StampAct, 1899. If the Sub-Registrar has valid reasons for refusing to register thedeeds of conveyance, he shall pass orders under Section 71 of theRegistration Act and communicate the same to the petitioner within a periodof two weeks from the date of receipt of such documents. No costs.
5. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
Date: 30.12.2014kvrm
_____________________JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
28
Writ Petition No.38338 of 2014
kvrm
Date: 30.12.2014