Telangana High Court
CRLP/7974/2015 of Yellapragada Maruthi Aravind, Vs The State of Telangana on 30 December 2015
SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.7974 of 2015 ORDER: This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4 in C.C.No.508 of 2014 on the file of the Court of I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARYCRIMINAL PETITION No.7974 of 2015ORDER:
This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking toquash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4in C.C.No.508 of 2014 on the file of the Court of I AdditionalJudicial Magistrate of First Class, Khammam, Khammam District.
At the time of arguments, learned counsel for the petitionershas sought permission of this Court to permit the petitioners towithdraw the criminal petition with liberty to avail all the remediesavailable to them under law including filing of a petition fordischarge. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitionersare facing much inconvenience to attend the trial Court on eachand every date of adjournment, hence, their presence before thetrial Court may be dispensed with.
Permission is granted.
Hence, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn withliberty to the petitioners to avail all the remedies available to themunder law including filing of a petition for discharge, if charges arealready not framed.The second petitioner is father, third petitioneris mother and fourth petitioner is the sister of accused No.1.There is no dispute with regard to the identity of the petitioners 2to 4/Accused Nos.2 to 4.Even if the presence of the petitioners 2to 4/A2, A3 and A4 is dispensed with, no prejudice would becaused to the second respondent.Hence, the presence of thepetitioners 2 to 4/A2 to A4 is dispensed with before the Court of IAdditional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Khammam, Khammam District, on each and every date of adjournment.However, they shall appear before the trial Court as and whentheir presence is so required.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending inthis Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
Date:30.12.2015Rns
_____________________
T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J